---
title: "Amerisolar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Amerisolar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Amerisolar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 27 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Amerisolar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Changzhou |
| Founded | 1993 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity | 9 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.weamerisolar.com](https://www.weamerisolar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Amerisolar, operating under Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing Group, is a professional solar PV module manufacturer with over 30 years of experience in production and quality control. The company operates manufacturing facilities across China, the USA, Vietnam, South Korea, and other countries, and serves markets...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Amerisolar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 27 | 340 | +313 |
| Max Power | 665 W | 760 W | +95 W |
| Avg Power | 546 W | 520 W | +26 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Amerisolar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.83% | 24.80% | +1.97 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.12% | 21.71% | +0.60 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Amerisolar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.340%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.038 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Amerisolar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (7.4%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 11 (40.7%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 9 (33.3%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 5 (18.5%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Amerisolar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 8 (29.6%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 13 (48.1%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 6 (22.2%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (74%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Amerisolar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 20 (74.1%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 7 (25.9%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Amerisolar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AS-8M132-HC-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AS-8M132-HC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AS-8M132-HC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AS-8M132-HC-650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-650w) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AS-8M132-HC-645W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-645w) | 645 | 20.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AS-8M132-HC-640W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-640w) | 640 | 20.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AS-7M144N-HC-590](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-590) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AS-7M144N-HC-585](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-585) | 585 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AS-7M144N-HC-580](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AS-7M144N-HC-575](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-575) | 575 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Amerisolar is a Chinese solar module manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, incorporated as Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing USA Co., Ltd., with origins dating to 1993. The company claims manufacturing operations across multiple continents and reported production capacity in the range of several GW, but it does not appear consistently on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list - an absence that can complicate project financing with institutional lenders and reduce buyer confidence on larger specifications. Trina Solar, founded in December 1997 in Changzhou by Jifan Gao, operates at an entirely different level of scale and market credibility. It was again recognized as a Tier 1 PV module manufacturer by BNEF in Q1 2025, ranked fourth globally by shipments in 2024 with over 70 GW delivered in that year alone, and surpassed 292 GW of cumulative shipments by mid-2025, with a presence spanning more than 160 countries. On institutional footprint and supplier continuity, Trina Solar holds a clear and substantial advantage.

Amerisolar's catalog covers residential rooftop, commercial, and utility-scale ground-mount applications, with both PERC and TOPCon cell technologies represented. Stated warranty terms run to 20 years on the product and 30 years on linear power output. However, independent quality assessments have at times returned mixed results, and buyers considering Amerisolar for sizable projects should seek current third-party test data before committing. Trina Solar's flagship Vertex series is built around n-type TOPCon technology, with efficiency reaching up to 22.5% on top-tier configurations. The Vertex S+ line serves residential and small commercial buyers, while larger-format Vertex N modules are a common choice for utility-scale and C&I ground-mount projects worldwide, supported by a well-established global service and logistics network.

For most international buyers - whether specifying panels for a single rooftop system or a multi-megawatt project - Trina Solar is the more reliable default due to its confirmed bankability, broad after-sales infrastructure, and demonstrated leadership in n-type TOPCon. Amerisolar and Trina Solar are not interchangeable: Amerisolar may be price-competitive in cash-funded, smaller-scale applications, but the lower transparency around independent quality validation makes it a higher-risk choice where performance guarantees and long-term supplier stability genuinely matter.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Amerisolar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Amerisolar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Amerisolar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.