---
title: "Amerisolar vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Amerisolar vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-q-cells"
---

# Amerisolar vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 27 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Amerisolar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Seoul |
| Founded | 1993 | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity | 9 GW/year | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.weamerisolar.com](https://www.weamerisolar.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Amerisolar, operating under Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing Group, is a professional solar PV module manufacturer with over 30 years of experience in production and quality control. The company operates manufacturing facilities across China, the USA, Vietnam, South Korea, and other countries, and serves markets...

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Amerisolar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 27 | 89 | +62 |
| Max Power | 665 W | 675 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 546 W | 468 W | +78 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Amerisolar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.83% | 23.20% | +0.37 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.12% | 21.21% | +0.10 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Amerisolar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.340%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.015 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 35 (39%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +3.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Amerisolar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (7.4%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 11 (40.7%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 9 (33.3%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 5 (18.5%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Amerisolar offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup)


| Power band | Amerisolar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 8 (29.6%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 13 (48.1%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 6 (22.2%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (74%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Amerisolar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 20 (74.1%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| TOPCon | 7 (25.9%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, Amerisolar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AS-8M132-HC-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AS-8M132-HC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AS-8M132-HC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AS-8M132-HC-650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-650w) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AS-8M132-HC-645W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-645w) | 645 | 20.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AS-8M132-HC-640W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-640w) | 640 | 20.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AS-7M144N-HC-590](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-590) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AS-7M144N-HC-585](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-585) | 585 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AS-7M144N-HC-580](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AS-7M144N-HC-575](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-575) | 575 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Amerisolar is a Chinese solar module manufacturer founded in 1993 and operating under the legal name Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing USA Co., Ltd., with headquarters in Shanghai. The company has established production and distribution operations across multiple continents, including bases in Europe, the Americas, and Asia-Pacific. Independent sources do not clearly confirm its standing on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list, and user reviews on platforms such as SolarReviews describe its bankability as uncertain relative to the industry's most-tracked names. Q-Cells, by contrast, traces its roots to Germany, where it was originally founded in 1999, before being acquired by South Korean conglomerate Hanwha Group in 2012. Now operating as Hanwha Q CELLS, the company holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and runs what independent sources describe as the largest solar manufacturing facility in the Western Hemisphere, located in Georgia, with US-based capacity reported at approximately 8.4 GW annually as of 2024. On institutional footprint, Q-Cells is the stronger of the two by a clear margin.

Amerisolar's catalog targets cost-sensitive commercial and mid-scale project buyers, competing primarily on price. Independent reviews note inconsistent quality control across production batches and mixed experiences with warranty claims, which limits its appeal for long-horizon installations. Q-Cells is best known for its proprietary Q.ANTUM PERC platform and the newer Q.ANTUM NEO series, which uses TOPCon cell architecture confirmed by multiple independent reviewers to exceed 22 percent efficiency. The brand spans residential rooftop, commercial, and light utility applications, and it is frequently recommended by US installers as a strong value option - positioned below ultra-premium names like Maxeon but well above generic budget offerings.

For most buyers in 2025, Q-Cells is the clearer default. Confirmed Tier 1 bankability, domestic US manufacturing, verified efficiency data, and a 25-year product warranty make it a lower-risk choice across residential and commercial segments. Amerisolar may suit price-driven procurement in markets where warranty enforcement is less of a priority, but its thinner institutional track record and inconsistent quality reports make it a higher-risk option for buyers with long time horizons.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/amerisolar \| Amerisolar solar panels - SolarReviews user ratings and overview \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/amerisolar/ \| Amerisolar panels profile and specs - EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert review of Hanwha Q CELLS solar panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels \| QCells solar panels review 2025 cost, efficiency and performance - EcoWatch \| review

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/jinkosolar-and-hanwha-q-cells-update-us-manufacturing-plans/ \| JinkoSolar and Hanwha Q CELLS update US manufacturing plans - PV Tech \| article

Sources:

\- \[Amerisolar solar panels - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/amerisolar)

\- \[Amerisolar panels profile - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/amerisolar/)

\- \[Expert review of Hanwha Q CELLS solar panels 2025 - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[QCells solar panels review 2025 - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels)

\- \[Hanwha Q CELLS US manufacturing plans - PV Tech\](https://www.pv-tech.org/jinkosolar-and-hanwha-q-cells-update-us-manufacturing-plans/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Amerisolar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Amerisolar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Amerisolar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.