---
title: "Amerisolar vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Amerisolar vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# Amerisolar vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 27 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Amerisolar | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Shanghai |
| Founded | 1993 | 2006 |
| Employees |  | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity | 9 GW/year | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [https://www.weamerisolar.com](https://www.weamerisolar.com) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

Amerisolar, operating under Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing Group, is a professional solar PV module manufacturer with over 30 years of experience in production and quality control. The company operates manufacturing facilities across China, the USA, Vietnam, South Korea, and other countries, and serves markets...

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Amerisolar | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 27 | 637 | +610 |
| Max Power | 665 W | 735 W | +70 W |
| Avg Power | 546 W | 523 W | +24 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Amerisolar | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.83% | 24.80% | +1.97 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.12% | 22.18% | +1.06 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Amerisolar | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.340%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.036 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 231 (36%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.7 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Amerisolar | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (7.4%) | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 11 (40.7%) | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 9 (33.3%) | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 5 (18.5%) | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Amerisolar | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 8 (29.6%) | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 13 (48.1%) | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 6 (22.2%) | 150 (23.5%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 50 (7.8%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (74%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Amerisolar | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 20 (74.1%) | 158 (24.8%) |
| TOPCon | 7 (25.9%) | 258 (40.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Amerisolar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AS-8M132-HC-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AS-8M132-HC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AS-8M132-HC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AS-8M132-HC-650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-650w) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AS-8M132-HC-645W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-645w) | 645 | 20.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AS-8M132-HC-640W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-640w) | 640 | 20.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AS-7M144N-HC-590](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-590) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AS-7M144N-HC-585](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-585) | 585 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AS-7M144N-HC-580](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AS-7M144N-HC-575](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-575) | 575 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Amerisolar and Jinko Solar are both China-headquartered solar module manufacturers, but they occupy very different positions in the global market. Amerisolar, founded in 1993, is a mid-scale producer with a declared production capacity of 9 GW and a focused lineup of 27 panel models. It is not listed on a major stock exchange and carries no published Tier 1 or bankability rating in the available data. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006, has grown into one of the world's largest solar manufacturers, reporting a production capacity of 130 GW, a workforce of over 33,800 employees, and a broad portfolio of 545 models. Listed on the NYSE and ranked by BloombergNEF as the most bankable solar module company in its 2024 survey - with a 100% bankability score - Jinko operates across more than 190 countries and has accumulated one of the largest global installation bases in the industry.

Technology-wise, Amerisolar's lineup is predominantly PERC-based, with that cell technology accounting for 74% of its models. The portfolio reaches a maximum module efficiency of 22.83% and a peak output of 665 Wp. One genuine competitive strength is the average product warranty of 30 years, which is meaningful for residential rooftop installers prioritising long-term security and simple, proven technology. The complete absence of bifacial products, however, limits Amerisolar's applicability in ground-mount or tracker-based systems where bifacial gain is a project driver. Jinko Solar leads on virtually every technical metric: its N-type TOPCon technology - present in 39.4% of its portfolio - delivers module efficiencies up to 24.8% and a peak output of 735 Wp. The better average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C compared to -0.34%/°C for Amerisolar translates to measurable energy gains in warmer climates. With 31.9% of its portfolio being bifacial, Jinko is well-positioned for utility-scale ground-mount projects, commercial C&I rooftop systems, and space-constrained residential installations alike.

For international buyers evaluating the two, the choice largely depends on project scale and financing requirements. Jinko Solar is the safer, more versatile option for any project where Tier 1 status, institutional bankability, or bifacial technology is required - which covers most commercial and utility-scale work. Amerisolar can be a cost-effective fit for straightforward residential or small off-grid installations where a long product warranty and mature PERC technology suffice, but its narrower portfolio and lack of bifacial options make it a limited choice for buyers with more demanding specifications.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Amerisolar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Amerisolar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Amerisolar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/amerisolar-vs-jinko-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.