---
title: "AKCOME vs Zonergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs Zonergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-zonergy"
---

# AKCOME vs Zonergy

Zonergy has the broader catalog (5 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Zigong, Sichuan |
| Founded | 2003 | 2007 |
| Employees |  | 201-300 |
| Annual capacity |  | null GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [http://www.zonergy.com](http://www.zonergy.com) |

Zonergy is a world-renowned enterprise specializing in smart microgrid integrated solutions. The company is committed to providing first-class smart micro-grid solutions for global customers, covering technology research and development, product production, sales and trade, engineering design and implementation, and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 5 | +2 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 460 W | +240 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 450 W | +222 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 21.16% | +1.38 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 20.70% | +0.93 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.350%/°C | +0.110 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 0 (0%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +5.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 1 (20.0%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 0 | 4 (80.0%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 0 | 5 (100.0%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | AKCOME | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 5 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Zonergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZPM 460MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-460mh3-72) | 460 | 21.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZPM 455MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-455mh3-72) | 455 | 20.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZPM 450MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-450mh3-72) | 450 | 20.7 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZPM 445MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-445mh3-72) | 445 | 20.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZPM 440MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-440mh3-72) | 440 | 20.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-zonergy)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-zonergy)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-zonergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-zonergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.