---
title: "AKCOME vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-znshine"
---

# AKCOME vs ZNShine

ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 3 models). ZNShine leads on peak efficiency at 22.83%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Suqian |
| Founded | 2003 | 1988 |
| Employees |  | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity |  | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 212 | +209 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 670 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 535 W | +137 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 22.83% | +0.29 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 21.35% | +0.28 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.089 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 89 (42%) | +58 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +1.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 47 (22.2%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 5 (2.4%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 59 (27.8%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 43 (20.3%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 99 (46.7%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (63%)


| Technology | AKCOME | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 134 (63.2%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 78 (36.8%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer originally incorporated in 2006, operating out of Hangzhou, Zhejiang province. The company - formerly known as Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology before a 2023 rename - built a reported module production capacity of roughly 3.8 GW and held Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status for a period. However, its institutional standing deteriorated sharply in 2024: AKCOME halted manufacturing at several subsidiaries, faced a possible delisting from Chinese stock exchanges, and saw a subsidiary file for bankruptcy due to debt obligations. It was subsequently removed from the Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 list and delisted from the TaiyangNews Top Solar Modules ranking after its website became inaccessible. ZNShine (ZNSHINE PV-TECH), by contrast, was founded over three decades ago and has maintained continuous Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status since 2015. It operates a reported 6 GW of annual production capacity and has been upgraded to a B rating in the PV Tech Bankability Ranking. The company maintains commercial offices across more than ten countries including Germany, the USA, Japan, and Australia, giving it a substantially stronger institutional footprint.

On the product side, AKCOME built its lineup around PERC and HJT cell technologies and had announced ambitions in perovskite R&D before its financial difficulties interrupted those plans. ZNShine currently offers a broader and more clearly active portfolio spanning PERC modules in multiple cell sizes, N-type TOPCon bifacial panels, and high-wattage HJT bifacial modules aimed at utility-scale ground-mount projects. The company also differentiates with graphene-coated glass for self-cleaning properties. While ZNShine serves residential buyers in markets like Australia, its primary channel is B2B clients - EPCs and project developers operating at scale.

For most buyers evaluating these two brands in 2025, ZNShine is the considerably safer default. AKCOME's manufacturing disruptions and loss of Tier 1 status raise serious concerns about warranty backstop and long-term supply continuity - factors that matter more than any panel specification difference.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/17/akcome-halts-some-manufacturing-faces-possible-chinese-stock-delisting/ \| Akcome halts manufacturing, faces possible Chinese stock delisting \| article

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels - Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/znshine-solar-panels-review \| Complete Review of ZNShine Solar Panels - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://gosolarquotes.com.au/review/znshine-solar-panels/ \| ZNShine Solar Panels Review 2025 - GoSolarQuotes \| review

\- https://a1solarstore.com/blog/znshine-solar-panels-review-lets-be-clear.html \| ZNShine Solar Panels Review 2026 - A1 SolarStore Magazine \| review

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.