---
title: "AKCOME vs Weran Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs Weran Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-weran-solar"
---

# AKCOME vs Weran Solar

Weran Solar has the broader catalog (17 vs 3 models). Weran Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.60%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | Weran Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China |  |
| Headquarters | Suzhou |  |
| Founded | 2003 |  |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |  |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | Weran Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 17 | +14 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 665 W | +35 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 571 W | +100 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | Weran Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 24.60% | +2.06 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 22.94% | +1.31 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | Weran Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.276%/°C | +0.036 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 6 (35%) | +65 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 26.8 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Weran Solar skews to higher efficiency: 41% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | Weran Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 2 (11.8%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 8 (47.1%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 7 (41.2%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | Weran Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 11 (64.7%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 0 | 5 (29.4%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 1 (5.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | AKCOME | Weran Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 17 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Weran Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [WR7-72HVD-665M](https://comparepv.com/panel/weran-solar-wr7-72hvd-665m) | 665 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [WR7-72HVD-660M](https://comparepv.com/panel/weran-solar-wr7-72hvd-660m) | 660 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [WR7-72HVD-655M](https://comparepv.com/panel/weran-solar-wr7-72hvd-655m) | 655 | 24.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [WR7-72HVD-650M](https://comparepv.com/panel/weran-solar-wr7-72hvd-650m) | 650 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [WR7-72HVD-645M](https://comparepv.com/panel/weran-solar-wr7-72hvd-645m) | 645 | 23.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [WR7-72HVD-640M](https://comparepv.com/panel/weran-solar-wr7-72hvd-640m) | 640 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LR7-72HTH 620M](https://comparepv.com/panel/weran-solar-lr7-72hth-620m) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LR7-72HTH 615M](https://comparepv.com/panel/weran-solar-lr7-72hth-615m) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LR7-72HTH 610M](https://comparepv.com/panel/weran-solar-lr7-72hth-610m) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LR7-72HTH 605M](https://comparepv.com/panel/weran-solar-lr7-72hth-605m) | 605 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province that built its business around heterojunction (HJT) solar modules and structural mounting systems. At its peak the company reported annual module capacity of approximately 3.8 GW and appeared on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list. However, in 2024 its core photovoltaic subsidiary filed for bankruptcy citing an inability to meet debt obligations, and its modules were subsequently removed from major industry tracking databases such as the TaiyangNews TOP SOLAR MODULES listing. Weran Solar, founded in 2015 and based in Shanghai, occupies a different market position: it functions primarily as an authorized LONGi distributor rather than an independent panel manufacturer, while also marketing its own branded products including batteries and inverters. LONGi - the underlying technology provider - holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and has maintained PV Tech's AAA bankability rating for many consecutive quarters. On institutional strength, Weran's supply chain connection to LONGi gives it a substantially more secure footing than AKCOME.

AKCOME's product focus, before insolvency, was almost exclusively HJT cell technology - a premium architecture valued for lower temperature coefficients and reduced long-term degradation - typically targeting commercial and industrial rooftop projects. Weran Solar's catalog draws on LONGi's Hi-MO lineup, which spans HPBC 2.0 back-contact modules for residential and commercial rooftops as well as TOPCon and PERC bifacial variants suited to utility-scale ground mounts. The company showcased HPBC 2.0 products at SNEC PV+ 2025 and has expanded distribution into West Africa, signaling a push into high-growth emerging markets.

For buyers evaluating these brands in 2025, the choice is effectively settled by AKCOME's bankruptcy proceedings. Procuring panels from an insolvent manufacturer carries serious risk around warranty enforcement, replacement parts, and long-term technical support - factors that outweigh any technology merits. Weran Solar, as a channel for bankable LONGi modules carrying CE, IEC, and UL certifications, is the more defensible option for most project types, though buyers should confirm which entity's warranty backs any given purchase.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels: An Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/top-solar-modules-listing-january-2025 \| TOP SOLAR MODULES Listing January 2025 - notes AKCOME delisting \| article

\- https://taiyangnews.info/technology/hjt-technology-trends-in-top-solar-modules-analysis-2024 \| HJT Technology Trends in TOP SOLAR MODULES Analysis 2024 \| article

\- https://eu.longi.com/press/longi-ranks-in-bnef-tier-1-list-for-q2-2025-recognizing-the-companys-technological-advancements-and-future-viability \| LONGi ranks in BNEF Tier 1 list for Q2 2025 \| article

Sources:

\- \[Akcome Solar Panels: An Independent Review by Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/)

\- \[TOP SOLAR MODULES Listing - January 2025\](https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/top-solar-modules-listing-january-2025)

\- \[HJT Technology Trends in TOP SOLAR MODULES Analysis 2024\](https://taiyangnews.info/technology/hjt-technology-trends-in-top-solar-modules-analysis-2024)

\- \[LONGi ranks in BNEF Tier 1 list for Q2 2025\](https://eu.longi.com/press/longi-ranks-in-bnef-tier-1-list-for-q2-2025-recognizing-the-companys-technological-advancements-and-future-viability)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Weran Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-weran-solar)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Weran Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-weran-solar)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Weran Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-weran-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-weran-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.