---
title: "AKCOME vs Ulica Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs Ulica Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-ulica-solar"
---

# AKCOME vs Ulica Solar

Ulica Solar has the broader catalog (76 vs 3 models). Ulica Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.88%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Jiaxing |
| Founded | 2003 | 2014 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.ulicasolar.com](https://www.ulicasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | Ulica Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 76 | +73 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 715 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 564 W | +108 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | Ulica Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 23.88% | +1.34 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 22.26% | +0.64 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | Ulica Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.303%/°C | +0.063 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 44 (58%) | +42 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 29.3 yrs | +0.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Ulica Solar skews to higher efficiency: 14% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 16 (21.1%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 45 (59.2%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 4 (5.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 11 (14.5%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 29 (38.2%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 4 (5.3%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 1 (1.3%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 22 (28.9%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 20 (26.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (95%)


| Technology | AKCOME | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 72 (94.7%) |
| N-type | 0 | 4 (5.3%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Ulica Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [UL-715M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-715m-132dgn) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [UL-710M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-710m-132dgn) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [UL-705M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-705m-132dgn) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [UL-700M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-700m-132dgn) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [UL-670M-132DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-670m-132dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [UL-670M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-670m-132hv) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [UL-665M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132hv) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [UL-665M-132DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [UL-660M-132DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-660m-132dg) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [UL-660M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-660m-132hv) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME (officially Zhejiang Akcome New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.) is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province that, at its peak, reported annual module production capacity of around 3.8 GW and held a position on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list through early 2024. However, the company's financial position deteriorated sharply amid China's solar oversupply crisis: a key subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024, and AKCOME's stock was delisted from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in August 2024 after shares fell below 1 yuan for 20 consecutive trading days. Ulica Solar (Ningbo Ulica Solar Science and Technology Co., Ltd.), also a Chinese manufacturer, was founded in 2005 and is headquartered in Ningbo, Zhejiang, with joint backing from Japanese trading house ITOCHU and Shanshan Group. Ulica has appeared continuously on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list since Q1 2020 and has reported module capacity growing into the multi-gigawatt range. On institutional footprint and current operational stability, Ulica Solar holds a clear and significant advantage.

Ulica Solar's commercial lineup centers on monocrystalline PERC half-cut modules spanning a wide wattage range, from compact residential formats to large-format utility panels. Its N-type monocrystalline cell technology has been recognized under China's National Torch Program, and the company holds 17 patents. Standard warranty terms include 12 years of product guarantee and 25 years of power output performance guarantee. AKCOME previously offered both PERC and HJT cell technologies and addressed residential and commercial segments, but its ongoing restructuring introduces genuine uncertainty around warranty continuity and future product supply.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Ulica Solar is the more defensible default. Its uninterrupted Tier 1 bankability status, backing from established corporate shareholders, and continued operations make it a lower-risk choice for any project where warranty fulfillment matters. AKCOME panels may still surface on the secondary market at attractive price points, but the company's unresolved bankruptcy proceedings represent a material risk that most installers and project lenders would be unwilling to absorb without significant additional due diligence.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/17/akcome-halts-some-manufacturing-faces-possible-chinese-stock-delisting/ \| AKCOME halts manufacturing, faces possible stock delisting - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/07/30/chinese-pv-industry-brief-akcome-provides-update-on-restructuring-process/ \| AKCOME provides update on restructuring process - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://energynews.oedigital.com/environment/2024/07/30/chinese-solar-company-akcomes-subsidiary-declares-personal-bankruptcy-amidst-plunging-prices-overcapacity \| AKCOME subsidiary declares bankruptcy amid overcapacity - OE Digital \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/ulica-review.html \| Ulica Solar panels independent review - SolarQuotes \| review

Sources:

\- \[AKCOME halts manufacturing, faces possible stock delisting - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/17/akcome-halts-some-manufacturing-faces-possible-chinese-stock-delisting/)

\- \[AKCOME provides update on restructuring process - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/07/30/chinese-pv-industry-brief-akcome-provides-update-on-restructuring-process/)

\- \[AKCOME subsidiary declares bankruptcy amid overcapacity - OE Digital\](https://energynews.oedigital.com/environment/2024/07/30/chinese-solar-company-akcomes-subsidiary-declares-personal-bankruptcy-amidst-plunging-prices-overcapacity)

\- \[Ulica Solar panels independent review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/ulica-review.html)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Ulica Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ulica-solar)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Ulica Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ulica-solar)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Ulica Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-ulica-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-ulica-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.