---
title: "AKCOME vs TPL Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs TPL Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-tpl-solar"
---

# AKCOME vs TPL Solar

TPL Solar has the broader catalog (113 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | TPL Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Pakistan |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Lahore |
| Founded | 2003 |  |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.tplsolar.com](https://www.tplsolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | TPL Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 113 | +110 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 670 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 288 W | +384 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | TPL Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 21.67% | +0.87 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 16.94% | +4.69 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | TPL Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.359%/°C | +0.119 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 0 (0%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | TPL Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 7 (6.2%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| \<20% | 0 | 99 (87.6%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 7 (6.2%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | TPL Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 5 (4.4%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 97 (85.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 6 (5.3%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 5 (4.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (95%)


| Technology | AKCOME | TPL Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 107 (94.7%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 6 (5.3%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, TPL Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TPL670M-132HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl670m-132hc) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TPL665M-132HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl665m-132hc) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TPL660M-132HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl660m-132hc) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TPL655M-132HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl655m-132hc) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TPL650M-132HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl650m-132hc) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TPL560M-144HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl560m-144hc) | 560 | 21.7 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TPL550M-144HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl550m-144hc) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TPL545M-144HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl545m-144hc) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TPL540M-144HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl540m-144hc) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TPL535M-144HC](https://comparepv.com/panel/tpl-solar-tpl535m-144hc) | 535 | 20.7 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

TPL Solar is a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer founded in 2009, operating at a sub-gigawatt annual production scale. The company holds standard industry certifications including TUV, CE, and IEC 61215/61730 but has not appeared on BloombergNEF Tier 1 or PV ModuleTech bankability lists, placing it firmly in the smaller-manufacturer category. AKCOME was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in Suzhou, Jiangsu; at its peak it claimed module production capacity in the multi-gigawatt range and secured a BloombergNEF Tier 1 ranking as recently as Q3 2023. However, AKCOME's institutional standing has deteriorated sharply: the company reported cumulative net losses exceeding CNY 2 billion between 2021 and 2023, a subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in mid-2024, and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange terminated the company's listing in August 2024. PV ModuleTech had already downgraded AKCOME to a CC+ bankability rating before the delisting. On institutional footprint, neither brand currently holds a credible bankability position, and AKCOME's position has actively worsened in the past two years.

TPL Solar's available catalog consists of standard crystalline silicon modules targeting price-sensitive residential and small commercial buyers, primarily through export markets. AKCOME built its product identity around N-type cell technology - confirmed by independent review sources to include TOPCon and HJT bifacial dual-glass modules with efficiency figures in the low-to-mid 20% range. The brand held Clean Energy Council approval for over 100 module variants in Australia, reflecting a genuine - if now precarious - push into premium residential and commercial segments.

For a buyer evaluating these two brands in 2025, neither can be recommended ahead of financially stable Tier 1 alternatives. AKCOME's bankruptcy reorganization makes warranty enforcement genuinely uncertain, which is a disqualifying risk for most project-finance and homeowner scenarios. TPL Solar is smaller but appears operationally intact, suiting buyers with tight budgets who can absorb the risks of a non-bankable brand. Anyone who can look elsewhere, however, should do so before committing to either manufacturer.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/17/akcome-halts-some-manufacturing-faces-possible-chinese-stock-delisting/ \| AKCOME halts manufacturing amid possible Chinese stock delisting \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/07/30/chinese-pv-industry-brief-akcome-provides-update-on-restructuring-process/ \| AKCOME provides update on restructuring process - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome solar panels independent review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome \| AKCOME solar panels review 2026 - ComparePV \| review

\- https://www.solarfeeds.com/biz/tpl-energy-co-limited/ \| TPL Solar company overview and Tier 1 status - SolarFeeds \| review

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs TPL Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-tpl-solar)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs TPL Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-tpl-solar)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs TPL Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-tpl-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-tpl-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.