--- title: "AKCOME vs TN Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AKCOME vs TN Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-tn-solar" --- # AKCOME vs TN Solar TN Solar has the broader catalog (10 vs 3 models). TN Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.02%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AKCOME | TN Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | | | Headquarters | Suzhou | | | Founded | 2003 | | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AKCOME | TN Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 3 | 10 | +7 | | Max Power | 700 W | 715 W | +15 W | | Avg Power | 672 W | 542 W | +129 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AKCOME | TN Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 23.02% | +0.48 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 21.08% | +0.54 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AKCOME | TN Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.280%/°C | +0.040 | | Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 5 (50%) | +50 pp | | Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution TN Solar skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AKCOME | TN Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 4 (40.0%) | | \<20% | 0 | 5 (50.0%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 1 (10.0%) | ## Power distribution AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup) | Power band | AKCOME | TN Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 1 (10.0%) | | 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 4 (40.0%) | | \<400W | 0 | 5 (50.0%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (50%) | Technology | AKCOME | TN Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 5 (50.0%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 5 (50.0%) | ## Top panels, AKCOME | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, TN Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE6-66HBD-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-se6-66hbd-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE6-66HBD-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-se6-66hbd-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE6-66HBD-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-se6-66hbd-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE6-66HBD-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-se6-66hbd-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE6-66HBD-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-se6-66hbd-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [TN5-54H-390](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-tn5-54h-390) | 390 | 20.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [TN5-54H-385](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-tn5-54h-385) | 385 | 19.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [TN5-54H-380](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-tn5-54h-380) | 380 | 19.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [TN5-54H-375](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-tn5-54h-375) | 375 | 19.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [TN5-54H-370](https://comparepv.com/panel/tn-solar-tn5-54h-370) | 370 | 19.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary TN Solar Co., Limited is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in China and founded in 2006, positioning itself as a vertically integrated producer covering silicon ingot, wafer, cell, and module assembly. The company operates a relatively modest production footprint - ENF Solar records indicate a handful of production lines - and its Tier 1 claims appear to be self-described rather than confirmed by BloombergNEF or independent bankability assessors. Independent third-party reviews are sparse, and the brand is largely absent from major industry tracking publications. AKCOME (Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd.), also founded in 2006 and publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange from 2010, built a substantially larger institutional profile, reaching an estimated 3.8 GW of annual module production capacity and achieving verified BloombergNEF Tier 1 status at least through 2022. On institutional footprint, AKCOME historically held the stronger position - though that standing is now deeply complicated by its financial situation. AKCOME differentiated itself through an early commitment to HJT (heterojunction) cell technology alongside a TOPCon lineup, targeting both residential and commercial rooftop segments across more than 30 countries, with a notable presence in Australia. TN Solar's catalog spans a wide power range from compact 20-200W specialty panels to standard 400-755W modules in PERC, TOPCon, and HJT variants, positioning the brand primarily toward budget commercial and OEM private-label buyers rather than premium or utility-scale demand. Neither brand is associated with large utility-scale ground-mount project pipelines in the way the top-five Chinese module giants are. For a typical buyer in 2025, neither brand represents a straightforward recommendation. AKCOME's subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024, was delisted from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in August 2024, and was dropped from TaiyangNews top module tracking in January 2025 - introducing serious warranty continuity and after-sales support risk. TN Solar, while apparently operational, lacks the independent review record and bankability documentation that lenders and large project developers require. Buyers prioritizing supply-chain certainty should look toward better-documented Tier 1 alternatives in 2025. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.enfsolar.com/tn-solar \| TN Solar Co. Limited - manufacturer profile on ENF Solar \| article \- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels - independent review by Solar Choice \| review \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome solar panels review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review \- https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome \| AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV \| review \- https://setpile.com/news/chinese-pv-industry-brief-akcome-provides-update-on-restructuring-process \| AKCOME restructuring update - Chinese PV Industry Brief \| article Sources: \- \[TN Solar Co., Limited - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/tn-solar) \- \[Akcome Solar Panels Review - Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/) \- \[Akcome Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html) \- \[AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome) \- \[AKCOME restructuring update - Setpile\](https://setpile.com/news/chinese-pv-industry-brief-akcome-provides-update-on-restructuring-process) \- \[AKCOME HJT technology profile - HJT PV\](https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs TN Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-tn-solar) - [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs TN Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-tn-solar) - [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs TN Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-tn-solar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-tn-solar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.