---
title: "AKCOME vs TCL - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs TCL solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-tcl"
---

# AKCOME vs TCL

AKCOME has the broader catalog (3 vs 0 models). AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | TCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Huizhou |
| Founded | 2003 | 1981 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.tcl.com](https://www.tcl.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | TCL | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 0 | +3 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 0 W | +700 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 0 W | +672 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | TCL | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | TCL | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 0 (0%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | TCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | TCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | AKCOME | TCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

TCL, headquartered in China and active in photovoltaics since 1981 through its TCL Zhonghuan subsidiary, operates at a scale that sets it apart from most mid-tier rivals, with module production capacity reaching roughly 24 GW and silicon wafer capacity exceeding 100 GW by 2025. AKCOME, founded in 2003 and also China-based, is a more specialized player focused exclusively on heterojunction (HJT) technology, with planned module capacity of around 6 GW and cell capacity approaching 10 GW. Neither brand currently holds BNEF Tier 1 bankability status per the portfolio data provided, which limits their accessibility in project-financed deals, but TCL's significantly greater manufacturing scale and vertical integration give it the stronger institutional footprint of the two.

Portfolio character differs in both technology and emphasis. TCL's 12-panel lineup is entirely TOPCon-based, averaging 665 Wp and 22.9% efficiency and peaking at 725 Wp and 23.3% - figures well suited to utility-scale ground mounts and premium residential rooftops where raw watts-per-square-meter matter most. All panels are bifacial with a 30-year warranty, though the temperature coefficient of -0.285%/C is unremarkable for TOPCon. AKCOME's three-product HJT range averages 671.7 Wp at 21.6% efficiency, topping out at 700 Wp and 22.54%. The efficiency gap of roughly 1.3 percentage points is noticeable, but AKCOME's standout metric is a temperature coefficient of -0.24%/C, which meaningfully reduces thermal power losses compared to TCL in hot climates. Both lineups are 100% bifacial with matching 30-year warranties.

For most buyers, TCL is the practical default: a deeper 12-product catalogue, higher average efficiency, and a larger manufacturing presence make it more versatile across utility, commercial, and residential segments. AKCOME makes a stronger case in persistently hot markets - the Middle East, South Asia, or Australia's inland regions - where its superior temperature coefficient can recover meaningful annual yield and partially offset the lower headline efficiency. Both suppliers carry non-Tier 1 status, so financed projects will require additional due diligence regardless of which brand is selected.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/tcl-zhonghuan-to-invest-us2-billion-in-25gw-n-type-cell-and-35gw-silicon-wafer-plants/ \| TCL Zhonghuan plans USD 2bn investment in 25 GW n-type cell plant \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/06/07/akcome-unveils-730-w-heterojunction-solar-panel/ \| Akcome unveils 730 W heterojunction solar modules - pv magazine \| article

\- https://www.pvtime.org/akcome-announces-1-32gw-hjt-solar-cell-and-module-production-project/ \| Akcome announces 1.32 GW HJT solar cell and module project - PVTIME \| article

\- https://solarquarter.com/2025/09/04/tcl-ranks-in-tier-1-pv-module-manufacturer-by-bnef-leading-with-technology-to-reshape-the-global-energy-ecosystem/ \| TCL ranks in BNEF Tier 1 PV module manufacturer list - SolarQuarter \| article

Sources:

\- \[TCL Zhonghuan 25 GW n-type investment - PV Tech\](https://www.pv-tech.org/tcl-zhonghuan-to-invest-us2-billion-in-25gw-n-type-cell-and-35gw-silicon-wafer-plants/)

\- \[Akcome 730 W HJT module - pv magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/06/07/akcome-unveils-730-w-heterojunction-solar-panel/)

\- \[Akcome 1.32 GW HJT project - PVTIME\](https://www.pvtime.org/akcome-announces-1-32gw-hjt-solar-cell-and-module-production-project/)

\- \[TCL BNEF Tier 1 ranking - SolarQuarter\](https://solarquarter.com/2025/09/04/tcl-ranks-in-tier-1-pv-module-manufacturer-by-bnef-leading-with-technology-to-reshape-the-global-energy-ecosystem/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs TCL](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-tcl)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs TCL](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-tcl)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs TCL](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-tcl)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-tcl

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

