---
title: "AKCOME vs SunKean - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs SunKean solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-sunkean"
---

# AKCOME vs SunKean

SunKean has the broader catalog (57 vs 3 models). SunKean leads on peak efficiency at 23.52%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | SunKean |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Wuxi, Jiangsu |
| Founded | 2003 | 2013 |
| Employees |  | 200+ |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.sunkean.com](https://www.sunkean.com) |

SUNKEAN specializes in providing sustainable energy connection solutions to global customers. They offer a range of products including solar cables, wire harnesses, and related connectors for photovoltaic, energy storage, and charging sectors. As of 2025, SUNKEAN employs over 200 people and operates a production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | SunKean | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 57 | +54 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 700 W |  |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 447 W | +225 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | SunKean | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 23.52% | +0.98 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 21.25% | +0.38 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | SunKean | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.060 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 44 (77%) | +23 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.9 yrs | +1.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

SunKean skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | SunKean |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 16 (28.1%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 20 (35.1%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 9 (15.8%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 7 (12.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 5 (8.8%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | SunKean |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 4 (7.0%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 1 (1.8%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 11 (19.3%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 35 (61.4%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 6 (10.5%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (39%)


| Technology | AKCOME | SunKean |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 14 (24.6%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 22 (38.6%) |
| PERC | 0 | 13 (22.8%) |
| N-type | 0 | 8 (14.0%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, SunKean


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKT700M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt700m12-132d5) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKT695M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt695m12-132d5) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKT690M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt690m12-132d5) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SKT685M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt685m12-132d5) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SKT680M12-132D5](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt680m12-132d5) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SKT555M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt555m10) | 555 | 21.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SKT550M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt550m10) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SKT545M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt545m10) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SKT540M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt540m10) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SKT535M10](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunkean-skt535m10) | 535 | 20.7 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

SunKean and AKCOME are both China-based solar module manufacturers, though they sit at very different stages of market maturity. SunKean was founded in 2013 and operates with a workforce of 200 or more employees, making it a relatively younger and leaner entrant; independent coverage of its bankability is limited and no confirmed Tier 1 designation was found in available sources. AKCOME, established in 2003 and headquartered in Jiangsu province, has the longer institutional track record and has pursued aggressive capacity expansion, including a planned 8.2 GW HJT production facility and a 10 GW vertically integrated plant. AKCOME achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in late 2023 but the context data and recent tracking indicate it does not currently hold that classification, which weakens its bankability profile. Neither company carries the same institutional weight as the tier-one incumbents, but AKCOME's decade-longer operating history and documented gigawatt-scale ambitions give it the stronger industrial footprint of the two.

On portfolio character, the two manufacturers diverge sharply. SunKean fields a broad lineup of 57 panels anchored by TOPCon cells, which represent about 39% of its catalog. Its average output sits at 447 Wp with a ceiling of 700 Wp, average efficiency of 21.2% rising to a peak of 23.5%, and roughly 77% bifacial coverage - a flexible range well suited to commercial rooftops and mixed-use residential or ground-mount projects. Its average warranty of just under 29 years and a temperature coefficient of -0.300%/°C are competitive but not best-in-class. AKCOME, by contrast, offers only 3 catalogued panels, all HJT technology, all bifacial, with a notably higher average output of 672 Wp, average efficiency of 21.6%, a 30-year warranty, and a significantly better temperature coefficient of -0.240%/°C. That thermal performance advantage makes AKCOME panels a stronger candidate for hot-climate or utility-scale ground-mount applications where energy yield under heat stress matters most.

For a typical buyer in 2025, SunKean's far wider catalog and competitive TOPCon efficiency ceiling make it the more practical default - procurement flexibility alone matters when sourcing at scale. AKCOME's specs are technically compelling, particularly its thermal performance and full bifacial standard, but a three-panel portfolio creates real supply-chain risk and limits project engineering options. Buyers specifically seeking high-wattage HJT modules for large ground-mount sites in warm climates should evaluate AKCOME's offering on its merits, but only after confirming current production lead times and warranty backstop arrangements given its non-bankable status.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pvtime.org/akcome-announces-1-32gw-hjt-solar-cell-and-module-production-project/ \| Akcome Announces 1.32GW HJT Solar Cell and Module Production Project \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/06/07/akcome-unveils-730-w-heterojunction-solar-panel/ \| Akcome unveils new 730 W heterojunction solar modules \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/ \| Akcome Technology on HJT cell production and copper plating processes \| article

\- https://www.ecogeneration.com.au/akcome-achieves-25-6-per-cent-hjt-cell-efficiency/ \| Akcome achieves 25.6% HJT cell efficiency \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/sunkean \| SunKean - Solar Panels - China (ENF Solar directory) \| review

Sources:

\- \[Akcome Announces 1.32GW HJT Solar Cell and Module Production Project\](https://www.pvtime.org/akcome-announces-1-32gw-hjt-solar-cell-and-module-production-project/)

\- \[Akcome unveils new 730 W heterojunction solar modules - pv magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/06/07/akcome-unveils-730-w-heterojunction-solar-panel/)

\- \[Akcome Technology on HJT cell production and copper plating processes - PV Tech\](https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/)

\- \[Akcome achieves 25.6% HJT cell efficiency - Ecogeneration\](https://www.ecogeneration.com.au/akcome-achieves-25-6-per-cent-hjt-cell-efficiency/)

\- \[SunKean - ENF Solar Directory\](https://www.enfsolar.com/sunkean)

\- \[Tier 1 Solar Panels List 2025 - RENVU\](https://www.renvu.com/blogs/learn/tier-1-solar-panels-list-2025-updated-manufacturers-rankings)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs SunKean](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunkean)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs SunKean](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sunkean)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs SunKean](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-sunkean)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-sunkean

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.