---
title: "AKCOME vs Sun Earth - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs Sun Earth solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-sun-earth"
---

# AKCOME vs Sun Earth

Sun Earth has the broader catalog (60 vs 3 models). Sun Earth leads on peak efficiency at 23.80%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | Sun Earth |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China |  |
| Headquarters | Suzhou |  |
| Founded | 2003 |  |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |  |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | Sun Earth | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 60 | +57 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 610 W | +90 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 510 W | +162 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | Sun Earth | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 23.80% | +1.26 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 22.42% | +0.79 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | Sun Earth | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.294%/°C | +0.054 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 38 (63%) | +37 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 30.9 yrs | +0.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Sun Earth skews to higher efficiency: 37% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | Sun Earth |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 14 (23.3%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 20 (33.3%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 2 (3.3%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 2 (3.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 22 (36.7%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | Sun Earth |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 4 (6.7%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 2 (3.3%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 24 (40.0%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 30 (50.0%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (82%)


| Technology | AKCOME | Sun Earth |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 49 (81.7%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 6 (10.0%) |
| PERC | 0 | 4 (6.7%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 1 (1.7%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sun Earth


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DXM8-72HBG 610W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-610w) | 610 | 23.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DXM8-72H-610](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-610) | 610 | 23.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DXM8-72HBG 600W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-600w) | 600 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DXM8-72H-600](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-600) | 600 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DXM8-72HBG 590W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-590w) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DXM8-72H-590](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-590) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SKT580M10-144D4](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-skt580m10-144d4) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DXM8-72HBG 580W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72hbg-580w) | 580 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DXM8-72H-580](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-dxm8-72h-580) | 580 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SKT575M10-144D4](https://comparepv.com/panel/sun-earth-skt575m10-144d4) | 575 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer based in Zhejiang province, operating formally as Zhejiang Akcome New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. The company scaled to multi-gigawatt output and earned a place on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 module list, though it was removed from that ranking in 2024, partly due to website accessibility issues flagged by industry trackers. Sun Earth is also China-based but carries a significantly longer operating history of roughly 35 years, with offices in Australia, Germany, and the United States; it has generally been classified as a Tier 2 supplier rather than a bankable Tier 1 brand. AKCOME's former Tier 1 recognition gave it the stronger institutional footprint, though that status is no longer current.

AKCOME built its identity around heterojunction (HJT) cell technology, producing large-format modules in the 655W to 700W range suited to commercial and utility-scale ground-mount applications. Its HJT modules appeared on TaiyangNews's TOP SOLAR MODULES benchmark list before being delisted in early 2025. Sun Earth takes a broader approach, covering residential, commercial, and off-grid segments with a reported module range of roughly 320W to 580W. Its catalog is said to lean heavily on TOPCon cell technology, supported by vertical integration from silicon through to finished panels that helps keep prices competitive. Much of the Sun Earth portfolio is also bifacial, making it viable for ground-mount or dual-glass rooftop systems.

For a 2025 buyer, Sun Earth's longer track record, wider distribution network, and cost-efficient supply chain make it the more accessible default for residential and small commercial projects. AKCOME's HJT technology was technically competitive, but its lapsed Tier 1 status and reduced market visibility add meaningful procurement risk. Neither brand competes directly with top-tier names such as JinkoSolar or LONGi, and buyers with strict project-finance bankability requirements should verify current lender acceptance before committing to either.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| AKCOME Solar Panels - Independent Review \| review

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| AKCOME Solar Panel Review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/sun-earth-solar-power \| Sun Earth Solar Power - Manufacturer Reviews \| review

\- https://greenworldinvestor.com/sun-earth-soar-panels-review/ \| Sun Earth Solar Panels Review - Green World Investor \| review

\- https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/top-solar-modules-listing-january-2025 \| TaiyangNews TOP SOLAR MODULES Listing - January 2025 \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sun Earth](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sun-earth)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sun Earth](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sun-earth)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Sun Earth](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-sun-earth)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-sun-earth

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.