---
title: "AKCOME vs Solarever - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs Solarever solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-solarever"
---

# AKCOME vs Solarever

Solarever has the broader catalog (12 vs 3 models). Solarever leads on peak efficiency at 23.52%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Mexico |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Colima |
| Founded | 2003 | 2012 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  | 1-2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.solarever.com.mx](https://www.solarever.com.mx) |

Solarever is a Mexican solar panel manufacturer, recognized as the number one national solar brand in Mexico, with a main production facility in the state of Colima. The company produces monocrystalline half-cut mono PERC solar panels and expanded into the US market in 2015-2016 through Solarever USA, with offices in...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | Solarever | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 12 | +9 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 630 W | +70 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 550 W | +121 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | Solarever | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 23.52% | +0.98 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 22.88% | +1.25 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | Solarever | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.294%/°C | +0.054 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 12 (100%) |  |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Solarever skews to higher efficiency: 42% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 7 (58.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 5 (41.7%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 7 (58.3%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 0 | 5 (41.7%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)


| Technology | AKCOME | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 12 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Solarever


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE-182\*105-630M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-630m-132-bd) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-625m-132-bd) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE-182\*105-620M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-620m-132-bd) | 620 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE-182\*105-615M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-615m-132-bd) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE-182\*105-610M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-610m-132-bd) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SE-182\*105-605M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-605m-132-bd) | 605 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SE-182\*105-600M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-600m-132-bd) | 600 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SE-182\*105-470M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-470m-96-bd) | 470 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-465m-96-bd) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SE-182\*105-460M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-460m-96-bd) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer, part of Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd, founded in 2006 and headquartered in Jiangsu, China, with operations spanning more than 30 countries. It has appeared on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list in past years, though at least one source notes it dropped off that tracking list in early 2025 after website accessibility issues, so its current bankability status should be verified before large project financing decisions. Reported manufacturing scale has included module capacity around 9 GW and cell capacity above 8 GW at points in the past few years, alongside a dedicated N-Type cell and module base at Changxing. Solarever traces its roots to a 2012-founded group with a related US entity, Solarever USA, established in 2016 and headquartered in Lake Forest, California; its panels are developed in China, manufactured largely in Mexico, and assembled in the US, with reported production around 1.1 GW per year and a newer 1.2 GW Mexican cell-and-panel plant announced to expand capacity, plus a commercial alliance with Tier 1 producer ZNShine Solar to support its US market credentials. On institutional footprint, AKCOME's longer history, larger reported production base, and past BNEF Tier 1 recognition give it a somewhat stronger global manufacturing pedigree, while Solarever's footprint is more regionally concentrated around North America.

Product-wise, AKCOME's catalog centers on N-Type TOPCon half-cut bifacial modules such as its Kookaburra series, with reported conversion efficiencies around 21.6 percent on average and up to roughly 22.5 percent on top models, positioning it for both residential rooftops and commercial-scale installations, backed by lengthy warranty terms in the 15 to 30 year range depending on the line. Solarever's offering is built around its North American manufacturing and assembly chain, aimed primarily at residential and light commercial rooftops in the US, Mexico, and Latin America, with installer feedback on platforms like EnergySage citing solid aesthetics, reliability, and price competitiveness rather than headline efficiency numbers; its partnership with ZNShine suggests it leans on that partner's Tier 1 cell technology rather than an independently disclosed dominant cell type.

For a typical 2025 buyer, the choice largely comes down to region and priorities: AKCOME's larger, longer-established Chinese manufacturing base and higher-efficiency N-Type modules can appeal to buyers prioritizing raw performance and global supply history, provided its current Tier 1 status is reconfirmed at purchase time, while Solarever is a reasonable default for North American buyers who value local manufacturing, assembly, and installer support, especially given its Tier 1-aligned partnership with ZNShine. Neither brand is clearly superior across the board, and the better fit depends on whether the buyer values documented cell efficiency and manufacturing scale or regional supply chain and installer network.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome Solar Panels Review - specs, efficiency, warranty details \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels: An Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/25194/solarever-usa/ \| Solarever USA - Profile & Reviews 2026 on EnergySage \| review

\- https://mexicobusiness.news/energy/news/solarever-longi-partnership-boosts-solar-innovation-mexico \| Solarever, LONGi Partnership Boosts Solar Innovation in Mexico \| article

\- https://a1solarstore.com/blog/solarever-solar-panels-review-hola-from-mexico.html \| Solarever solar panels review 2026 - manufacturing and market profile \| review

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-solarever)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solarever)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-solarever)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-solarever

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

