---
title: "AKCOME vs Sharp - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs Sharp solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-sharp"
---

# AKCOME vs Sharp

Sharp has the broader catalog (19 vs 3 models). Sharp leads on peak efficiency at 23.82%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Japan |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Sakai, Osaka Prefecture |
| Founded | 2003 | 1912 |
| Employees |  | 40,123 |
| Annual capacity |  | 15.4 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | TYO: 6753 |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://global.sharp](https://global.sharp) |

Sharp Corporation is a Japanese electronics company founded in 1912. It operates globally, offering a wide range of products including consumer electronics, home appliances, energy solutions, and business solutions. Since 2016, it has been majority-owned by Foxconn.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 19 | +16 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 740 W | +40 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 576 W | +96 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 23.82% | +1.28 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 22.20% | +0.57 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.060 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 10 (53%) | +47 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 27.6 yrs | +2.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Sharp skews to higher efficiency: 32% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 7 (36.8%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 5 (26.3%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 1 (5.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 6 (31.6%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 7 (36.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 6 (31.6%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 6 (31.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (37%)


| Technology | AKCOME | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 7 (36.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 7 (36.8%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 5 (26.3%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sharp


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GSD8K66H-740WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-740wt) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GSD8K66H-735WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-735wt) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GSD8K66H-730WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-730wt) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [GSD8K66H-725WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-725wt) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GSD8K66H-720WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-720wt) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [GSD8K66H-715WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-715wt) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GSD8K66H-710WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-710wt) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NB-JD580](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NB-JD575](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd575) | 575 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NB-JD570](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd570) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2006, headquartered in Zhejiang province with a panel factory in Huzhou. The company built module capacity reported at around 3.8 GW and was recognized on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list for a period, but was removed from that ranking in 2024. Critically, Zhejiang Akcome Photoelectricity Technology filed for bankruptcy in 2024 citing an inability to meet debt obligations, and as of early 2025 the company was dropped from TaiyangNews's TOP SOLAR MODULES listing. Sharp, by contrast, is a Japanese electronics giant founded in 1912 and formally incorporated in Osaka in 1970. Sharp began solar cell research in 1959 and started mass production in 1963, making it one of the longest-running names in photovoltaics. Sharp Energy Solutions Corporation retains Tier 1 bankable status and commands far deeper institutional recognition globally, though its solar footprint has narrowed considerably in recent years.

Sharp's product portfolio spans residential rooftops, commercial installations, and industrial applications, with a technology mix that - according to recent catalog data - includes HJT, PERC, and TOPCon cells across a wide power range. The company supplied panels to markets across Europe, North America, and Asia for decades, though it announced an exit from the European market effective March 2025 and no longer distributes in North America either, leaving the Japanese domestic market as its primary focus. AKCOME had developed two main product lines - the AK iPower series based on HJT technology and the AK iTopper series built on TOPCon - and had invested in perovskite R&D as recently as early 2024. However, its financial collapse makes procurement from AKCOME a significant risk for any new project.

For a typical buyer in 2025, neither manufacturer presents an easy recommendation in most markets. Sharp panels carry genuine engineering heritage and remain bankable, but its geographic withdrawal means availability outside Japan is now very limited. AKCOME's insolvency filing in 2024 makes warranty enforcement and long-term product support unreliable regardless of panel technology. Buyers outside Japan should explore alternative manufacturers with stable supply chains; if Sharp panels are available locally, the brand's track record gives it a clear edge over AKCOME's current distressed status.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/ \| Akcome Technology on HJT cell production and copper plating processes \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/01/02/chinese-pv-industry-brief-akcome-sets-up-pilot-factory-for-perovskite-pv-cells/ \| PV Magazine - Akcome perovskite pilot factory announcement 2024 \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/sharp-solar-panels \| Sharp Solar Panels - How They Compare To Other Top Brands \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/445/sharp-solar/ \| Sharp Solar Profile and Reviews 2025 - EnergySage \| review

Sources:

\- \[Akcome Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html)

\- \[Akcome Technology on HJT cell production - PV Tech\](https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/)

\- \[Akcome perovskite pilot factory - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/01/02/chinese-pv-industry-brief-akcome-sets-up-pilot-factory-for-perovskite-pv-cells/)

\- \[Sharp Solar Panels review - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/sharp-solar-panels)

\- \[Sharp Solar Profile - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/supplier/445/sharp-solar/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sharp)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sharp)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-sharp)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-sharp

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.