---
title: "AKCOME vs Runergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs Runergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-runergy"
---

# AKCOME vs Runergy

Runergy has the broader catalog (124 vs 3 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province |
| Founded | 2003 | 2013 |
| Employees |  | 15,000 |
| Annual capacity |  | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) |

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 124 | +121 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 740 W | +40 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 579 W | +93 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 24.10% | +1.56 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 22.42% | +0.79 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.298%/°C | +0.058 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 95 (77%) | +23 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 26 (21.0%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 48 (38.7%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 9 (7.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 41 (33.1%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 35 (28.2%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 25 (20.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 36 (29.0%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 28 (22.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (60%)


| Technology | AKCOME | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 18 (14.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 74 (59.7%) |
| PERC | 0 | 32 (25.8%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Both AKCOME and Runergy are Chinese solar manufacturers, but they occupy notably different positions in the market. AKCOME was founded in 2003 and built its identity around heterojunction (HJT) technology, though it is not currently rated as Tier 1 bankable under BloombergNEF and was delisted from major module tracking indexes in early 2025. Runergy, founded in 2013, carries a much stronger institutional profile: it maintained BloombergNEF Tier 1 status across all four quarters of 2024 and into Q1 2025, employs roughly 15,000 people, and operates module production capacity of 23 GW backed by 63 GW of cell capacity, placing it firmly among mid-tier global manufacturers by scale.

On the portfolio level, the two lineups reflect sharply different commercial philosophies. AKCOME fields just three panels, all bifacial HJT, averaging 672 Wp and 21.6% module efficiency, peaking at 700 Wp and 22.5%. Its most distinctive asset is a temperature coefficient of -0.24%/°C, one of the strongest available for any cell technology, and a 30-year warranty reinforces the premium pitch - making this lineup well suited to heat-intensive rooftop installations. Runergy's 98-panel catalog spans a far wider range: average output is 574 Wp with a peak of 740 Wp, average module efficiency is 22.2% with a top of 23.8%, and 58% of panels use N-type cells, with 79% bifacial. Its temperature coefficient averages -0.30%/°C, respectable for N-type but a clear step behind HJT. Average warranty sits near 29 years. Runergy's depth covers everything from residential rooftops to utility-scale ground mounts.

For most buyers in 2025, Runergy is the more practical default. Tier 1 bankability simplifies project financing, the broad product range suits varied project types, and a Kiwa PVEL Top Performer designation from independent reliability testing adds meaningful third-party credibility. AKCOME's HJT panels remain a genuine option for projects where best-in-class temperature performance justifies a narrower product choice, but the absence of Tier 1 status introduces financing friction that most commercial and utility developers will prefer to avoid.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/industry-updates/runergy-n-type-solar-module-recognised-as-top-performer-by-kiwa-pvel/ \| Runergy N-type module named Top Performer by Kiwa PVEL \| article

\- https://scorecard.pvel.com/manufacturer\_name/runergy/ \| Runergy profile - Kiwa PVEL PV Module Reliability Scorecard \| review

\- https://solarbytes.info/business-bytes/runergy-bnef-tier1-q1-2025-solar-module-expansion-8764407 \| Runergy secures BNEF Tier 1 for sixth consecutive quarter \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/06/07/akcome-unveils-730-w-heterojunction-solar-panel/ \| Akcome unveils 730 W heterojunction solar modules - pv magazine \| article

\- https://taiyangnews.info/technology/hjt-technology-trends-in-top-solar-modules-analysis-2024 \| HJT Technology Trends in Top Solar Modules Analysis 2024 \| article

Sources:

\- \[Runergy N-type module named Top Performer by Kiwa PVEL\](https://www.pv-tech.org/industry-updates/runergy-n-type-solar-module-recognised-as-top-performer-by-kiwa-pvel/)

\- \[Runergy - Kiwa PVEL PV Module Reliability Scorecard\](https://scorecard.pvel.com/manufacturer\_name/runergy/)

\- \[Runergy secures BNEF Tier 1 for sixth consecutive quarter\](https://solarbytes.info/business-bytes/runergy-bnef-tier1-q1-2025-solar-module-expansion-8764407)

\- \[Akcome unveils 730 W heterojunction solar modules\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/06/07/akcome-unveils-730-w-heterojunction-solar-panel/)

\- \[HJT Technology Trends in Top Solar Modules Analysis 2024\](https://taiyangnews.info/technology/hjt-technology-trends-in-top-solar-modules-analysis-2024)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-runergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-runergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.