--- title: "AKCOME vs RMCIP - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AKCOME vs RMCIP solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-rmcip" --- # AKCOME vs RMCIP AKCOME has the broader catalog (3 vs 1 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AKCOME | RMCIP | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | Russia | | Headquarters | Suzhou | Ryazan | | Founded | 2003 | 1963 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | \<0.1 GW/year | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [http://rmcip.com](http://rmcip.com) | Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC (RMCIP) is a Russian industrial manufacturer established in 1963, primarily known as the only producer of sealed magnetically operated contacts (reed switches) in Russia and CIS countries. The company also manufactures crystalline silicon photovoltaic solar modules (RZMP... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AKCOME | RMCIP | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 3 | 1 | +2 | | Max Power | 700 W | 200 W | +500 W | | Avg Power | 672 W | 200 W | +472 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AKCOME | RMCIP | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 12.40% | +10.14 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 12.40% | +9.23 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AKCOME | RMCIP | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.400%/°C | +0.160 | | Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 0 (0%) | +100 pp | | Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +5.0 yr | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | AKCOME | RMCIP | | --- | --- | --- | | 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 0 | | \<20% | 0 | 1 (100.0%) | ## Power distribution AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup) | Power band | AKCOME | RMCIP | | --- | --- | --- | | 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 | | \<400W | 0 | 1 (100.0%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%) | Technology | AKCOME | RMCIP | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 | | Unknown | 0 | 1 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, AKCOME | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, RMCIP | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [RZMP-200-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/rmcip-rzmp-200-t) | 200 | 12.4 | -0.400 | Polycrystalline | ## Summary RMCIP, short for Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC, is a Russian manufacturer headquartered in Ryazan, Russia. Its solar manufacturing scale is modest - public records suggest annual capacity in the low tens of megawatts, and the company does not appear on any major bankability tier list, including those published by BloombergNEF. Its crystalline silicon modules cover a wattage range generally up to 275 watts, oriented toward domestic or regional deployment rather than large-scale internationally financed projects. AKCOME (Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd), founded in China in 2006 and publicly listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in 2010, operates at a considerably larger scale, employing more than 6,000 people across more than 30 countries. AKCOME appeared on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list as of 2022, giving it a materially stronger institutional footprint than RMCIP. AKCOME's product line is built around heterojunction (HJT) technology, with reviewers confirming module efficiencies reaching approximately 22.5% in top-end models, alongside TOPCon and PERC half-cut bifacial offerings marketed under the Kookaburra brand in markets such as Australia. The company also owns and operates over 50 solar farms in the Asia-Pacific region with a combined capacity reported at above 1.5 GW. RMCIP's modules are conventional crystalline silicon designs suited to smaller residential or off-grid installations, and no third-party sources confirm advanced cell technologies such as TOPCon or HJT in its current lineup. For most buyers in 2025, AKCOME is the stronger default option: it carries documented Tier 1 bankability history, an HJT- and TOPCon-led product portfolio, and meaningful international distribution. Independent Australian reviewers position it at the budget end of the pricing spectrum while noting competitive specifications, making it reasonable for cost-conscious residential or light commercial projects. RMCIP remains principally a domestic Russian-market product with limited external verification and negligible presence in internationally financed project pipelines. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome solar panels review - SolarQuotes \| review \- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels: Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review \- https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome \| AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/rmcip \| RMCIP manufacturer profile - ENF Solar database \| article \- https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/top-solar-modules-listing-january-2025 \| TOP SOLAR MODULES Listing January 2025 - TaiyangNews \| article Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs RMCIP](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-rmcip) - [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs RMCIP](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-rmcip) - [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs RMCIP](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-rmcip) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-rmcip Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.