---
title: "AKCOME vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-q-cells"
---

# AKCOME vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 3 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Seoul |
| Founded | 2003 | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 89 | +86 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 675 W | +25 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 468 W | +203 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 23.20% | +0.66 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 21.21% | +0.41 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.085 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 35 (39%) | +61 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +3.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 29 (32.6%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 11 (12.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | AKCOME | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 38 (42.7%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 8 (9.0%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province, with operations spanning photovoltaic modules and mounting systems. The company has appeared on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists in prior reporting periods, though its standing has varied between recent quarterly rankings. Its reported module production capacity stands at roughly 3.8 GW per year. Q CELLS traces its origins to Germany, where it was founded in 1999, and has been part of the South Korean conglomerate Hanwha since 2012. It holds a consistent BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation and operates one of the largest solar manufacturing footprints in the Western Hemisphere, with US module capacity alone reaching approximately 8.4 GW following the completion of facilities in Dalton and Cartersville, Georgia, and global module capacity exceeding 11 GW. On institutional scale, distribution breadth, and bankability track record, Q CELLS carries the clearly stronger footprint.

AKCOME has built a niche around heterojunction (HJT) cell technology, offering high-bifaciality dual-glass modules suited primarily to utility-scale ground-mount and large commercial rooftop installations. Its HJT modules deliver efficiencies in the low-to-mid 22 percent range, with strong rear-side energy capture making them competitive in open-field layouts where diffuse light contribution matters. Q CELLS serves a broader range of segments, from premium residential rooftops to large commercial and utility projects. Its flagship Q.ANTUM NEO series is built on TOPCon cell architecture with comparable peak efficiencies, and the brand is noted for a low temperature coefficient that translates to measurable performance gains in hot climates. Its US domestic supply chain can also carry procurement advantages under current trade policy and federal incentive frameworks.

For most buyers - particularly residential and commercial customers in North America or Europe - Q CELLS is the safer default in 2025, combining sustained Tier 1 bankability, a well-tested warranty infrastructure, and domestic US manufacturing. AKCOME is a credible alternative for utility developers or EPC contractors comfortable sourcing HJT-specialist modules from China, provided they verify its current Tier 1 status before project financing. The two brands are not directly interchangeable given AKCOME's specialist positioning, but both occupy a legitimate mid-to-upper tier of the global module market.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Hanwha Q CELLS solar panels - expert review 2025 \| review

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| AKCOME solar panels review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/ \| AKCOME HJT solar panel producer profile \| article

\- https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-new-cartersville-factory-set-for-33-gw-of-solar-module-production-per-year.do \| Hanwha Qcells Cartersville factory - 3.3 GW capacity announcement \| article

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels \| QCells solar panels review - cost, efficiency and performance 2025 \| review

Sources:

\- \[Expert Review Of Qcells Solar Panels For 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Akcome Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html)

\- \[AKCOME HJT Solar Panel Producer Profile\](https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/)

\- \[Hanwha Qcells Cartersville 3.3 GW Factory Announcement\](https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-new-cartersville-factory-set-for-33-gw-of-solar-module-production-per-year.do)

\- \[QCells Solar Panels Review 2025 - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.