--- title: "AKCOME vs Peimar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AKCOME vs Peimar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-peimar" --- # AKCOME vs Peimar Peimar has the broader catalog (5 vs 3 models). Peimar leads on peak efficiency at 23.04%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AKCOME | Peimar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | Italy | | Headquarters | Suzhou | Torino | | Founded | 2003 | 2012 | | Employees | | 50 | | Annual capacity | | 0.3 GW/year | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.peimar.com](https://www.peimar.com) | Peimar is an Italian manufacturer of photovoltaic modules. Based in Turin, the company designs and produces solar panels for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications, with a focus on the European market. ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AKCOME | Peimar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 3 | 5 | +2 | | Max Power | 700 W | 595 W | +105 W | | Avg Power | 672 W | 440 W | +232 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AKCOME | Peimar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 23.04% | +0.50 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 20.23% | +1.40 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AKCOME | Peimar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.346%/°C | +0.106 | | Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 2 (40%) | +60 pp | | Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution Peimar skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AKCOME | Peimar | | --- | --- | --- | | 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 1 (20.0%) | | 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 0 | | \<20% | 0 | 2 (40.0%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 2 (40.0%) | ## Power distribution AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup) | Power band | AKCOME | Peimar | | --- | --- | --- | | 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 | | \<400W | 0 | 2 (40.0%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 1 (20.0%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 2 (40.0%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (60%) | Technology | AKCOME | Peimar | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 | | PERC | 0 | 3 (60.0%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 2 (40.0%) | ## Top panels, AKCOME | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Peimar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [OR10H595MNDB](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-or10h595mndb) | 595 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SA500M (FB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sa500m-fb) | 500 | 21.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [OR10H450MNDB (FB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-or10h450mndb-fb) | 450 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SG330P](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sg330p) | 330 | 17.0 | -0.430 | Polycrystalline | | 5 | [SG325P](https://comparepv.com/panel/peimar-sg325p) | 325 | 16.7 | -0.430 | Polycrystalline | ## Summary AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang Province that has appeared on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable module list and operates at a reported annual module production capacity of roughly 3.8 GW. The company built its reputation around high-efficiency cell technologies, with its HJT product line - the Ak iPower series - reaching outputs around 695 W and efficiencies above 22%. That said, industry tracking sites noted that AKCOME's web presence became inaccessible in early 2025, resulting in its modules being delisted from the TaiyangNews TOP SOLAR MODULES tracking list, which introduces some uncertainty about current supply chain continuity. Peimar, by contrast, is an Italian manufacturer founded in 2007 and headquartered in Castegnato, Brescia, with a primary production facility there and a secondary plant in Ningbo, China, giving it a combined capacity in the range of 450 MW annually - a notably smaller industrial footprint. Peimar has been cited as a Tier 1 manufacturer, though the strength of its BNEF standing is less independently documented than AKCOME's. On institutional scale alone, AKCOME has historically carried the larger footprint. Peimar's catalog focuses on monocrystalline PERC modules spanning residential rooftops, small commercial arrays, and off-grid applications including marine and RV use, where its European design credentials and compact form factors resonate with buyers. It offers a notably extended 20-year product warranty and a 30-year linear power warranty, which compares favorably with the 10-to-12-year product guarantees common among volume Chinese producers. AKCOME's product families, before the 2025 listing disruption, targeted both residential and commercial-scale projects with its higher-wattage HJT and PERC modules, appealing to installers looking for cutting-edge cell technology at competitive price points. For a typical buyer in 2025, the picture is complicated by AKCOME's unresolved availability signals. Peimar is the more straightforward choice for European residential and light commercial buyers who value a clear supply chain, Italian manufacturing heritage, and long warranty terms, even at smaller module wattages. AKCOME would be worth reconsidering once its distribution and website stability questions are resolved, particularly for buyers who need high-wattage HJT modules at scale. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| AKCOME Solar Panels - Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review \- https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/top-solar-modules-listing-january-2025 \| TaiyangNews TOP SOLAR MODULES Listing January 2025 \| article \- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/21270/peimar-group/ \| Peimar Group - Profile and Reviews 2026 - EnergySage \| review \- https://www.solarfeeds.com/biz/peimar-group/ \| Peimar Company Overview - Production Capacity and Tier 1 status \| article \- https://solartechonline.com/blog/peimar-solar-panels-review-guide/ \| Peimar Solar Panels Review 2025 - Italian Quality and Performance \| review Sources: \- \[AKCOME Solar Panels - Independent Review by Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/) \- \[TaiyangNews TOP SOLAR MODULES Listing January 2025\](https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/top-solar-modules-listing-january-2025) \- \[Peimar Group - Profile and Reviews 2026 - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/supplier/21270/peimar-group/) \- \[Peimar Company Overview - Production Capacity and Tier 1 status\](https://www.solarfeeds.com/biz/peimar-group/) \- \[Peimar Solar Panels Review 2025 - Italian Quality and Performance\](https://solartechonline.com/blog/peimar-solar-panels-review-guide/) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Peimar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-peimar) - [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Peimar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-peimar) - [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs Peimar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-peimar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-peimar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.