---
title: "AKCOME vs MWG - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs MWG solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-mwg"
---

# AKCOME vs MWG

AKCOME has the broader catalog (3 vs 2 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | MWG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Poland |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Zabrze |
| Founded | 2003 | 2005 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://mwpower.pl](https://mwpower.pl) |

MW Power is a Polish brand operating under MPL Group, offering a range of technology products including photovoltaic panels sold under the MW Green Power (MWG) brand. Their solar modules are small-wattage units (10W–100W) made from monocrystalline silicon, primarily intended for autonomous and off-grid energy systems...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | MWG | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 2 | +1 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 400 W | +300 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 370 W | +302 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | MWG | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 20.12% | +2.42 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 19.72% | +1.91 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | MWG | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.390%/°C | +0.150 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 0 (0%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +5.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | MWG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| \<20% | 0 | 1 (50.0%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 1 (50.0%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | MWG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 1 (50.0%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 1 (50.0%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | AKCOME | MWG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 2 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, MWG


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MWG-400M](https://comparepv.com/panel/mwg-mwg-400m) | 400 | 19.3 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MWG-340M](https://comparepv.com/panel/mwg-mwg-340m) | 340 | 20.1 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province, established in 2006 and listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in 2010. The company built module manufacturing capacity in the multi-gigawatt range and has distribution in more than 30 countries. It held Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status for a period before being removed from that list in 2024, and independent bankability ratings as of mid-2024 placed it in the CC+ category, indicating elevated investor risk relative to top-tier suppliers. MWG - marketed under the MW Green Power label - appears to be a significantly smaller operation, primarily reaching customers through electronics component distributors in Central Europe, with no credible bankability rating or industry-ranking presence found in available sources. By institutional footprint, AKCOME is the larger and more documented of the two by a considerable margin.

AKCOME has publicly committed to n-type cell technology, offering both HJT and TOPCon module lines targeting residential rooftops and larger commercial or utility-scale ground mounts; the brand is generally positioned at the budget-to-mid tier in markets such as Australia, competing primarily on price rather than premium efficiency credentials. MW Green Power's catalog, as seen in European distributor listings, consists mainly of small polycrystalline panels in the sub-200W range - formats suited to off-grid applications, caravans, boats, and small autonomous systems rather than grid-tied residential or commercial installations.

For a buyer evaluating full-size grid-tied solar panels in 2025, AKCOME is the only realistic candidate between these two brands, given that MWG appears to serve a different and much smaller-scale market segment. That said, AKCOME's lapsed Tier 1 status and below-average bankability score mean buyers should verify current warranty backstop arrangements and seriously weigh higher-rated alternatives before committing to a large installation.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels Independent Review - Solar Choice \| review

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/ \| Akcome Technology on HJT cell production and copper plating \| article

\- https://7sun.eu/pv-moduletech-bankability-ratings-q2-2024/ \| PV ModuleTech Bankability Ratings Q2 2024 \| article

Sources:

\- \[Akcome Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html)

\- \[Akcome Solar Panels Independent Review - Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/)

\- \[Akcome Technology on HJT cell production - PV Tech\](https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/)

\- \[PV ModuleTech Bankability Ratings Q2 2024\](https://7sun.eu/pv-moduletech-bankability-ratings-q2-2024/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs MWG](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-mwg)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs MWG](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-mwg)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs MWG](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-mwg)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-mwg

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

