---
title: "AKCOME vs Lina Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs Lina Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-lina-energy"
---

# AKCOME vs Lina Energy

Lina Energy has the broader catalog (37 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | United Kingdom |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Lancaster |
| Founded | 2003 | 2017 |
| Employees |  | 28 |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.lina.energy/](https://www.lina.energy/) |

LiNa Energy is a technology company specializing in the development and provision of low-cost, high-performance, and safe sodium batteries. The company focuses on renewable energy storage solutions, offering a safer and more sustainable alternative to lithium-ion batteries. Their solid-state sodium battery technology...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | Lina Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 37 | +34 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 550 W | +150 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 402 W | +270 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | Lina Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 22.37% | +0.17 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 20.32% | +1.31 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | Lina Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.352%/°C | +0.112 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 7 (19%) | +81 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.4 yrs | +1.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 12 (32.4%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 7 (18.9%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 12 (32.4%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 6 (16.2%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 18 (48.6%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 15 (40.5%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 4 (10.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (30%)


| Technology | AKCOME | Lina Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 13 (35.1%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 11 (29.7%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 8 (21.6%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 4 (10.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 1 (2.7%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Lina Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [LEPV 550](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-550) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [LEPV 550 (LEPV 144 HALF-CUT PLUS)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-550-lepv-144-half-cut-plus) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [LEPV 132 HC ICON PLUS 500Wp (BLACK - STANDARD - BICOLOUR)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-132-hc-icon-plus-500wp-black-standard-bicolour) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [LEPV 500](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-500) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LEPV 480](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-480) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [LEPV 475](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-475) | 475 | 21.9 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LEPV 460](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-460) | 460 | 21.2 | -0.381 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [LEPV 450](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-450) | 450 | 20.7 | -0.381 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LEPV 132 ULTRA PREMIUM BLACK 440Wp (LEPV 440)](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-132-ultra-premium-black-440wp-lepv-440) | 440 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LEPV 440](https://comparepv.com/panel/lina-energy-lepv-440) | 440 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Jiangsu province that built a significant presence in PV modules and mounting systems through the early 2020s, with reported annual module production capacity of around 3.8 GW. The company previously held BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability recognition, but its institutional standing collapsed in 2024: after reporting cumulative net losses of roughly CNY 2.1 billion over three years, a subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024, and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange delisted AKCOME's shares in August 2024. Lina Energy, by contrast, is a smaller company founded in 2016 and headquartered in Bulgaria, with offices in the UK, Canada, Jordan, and China. No confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status has been documented for Lina Energy in publicly available sources, and its production scale is a fraction of AKCOME's former output - but AKCOME's current operational viability is in serious doubt, which heavily qualifies that comparison. On institutional footprint as of mid-2025, neither brand commands a leading position, and AKCOME's former standing has been effectively forfeited.

In terms of product families, AKCOME historically served residential rooftops and commercial or utility ground-mount applications alongside a racking systems business, with efficiency ratings reaching around 22.5% on its strongest models. Lina Energy offers a mixed catalog that third-party review aggregators document as including TOPCon and BIPV variants alongside conventional monocrystalline options, with average module efficiency around 20.3% and a 28-year performance warranty on most products. The company appears to target residential and light-commercial buyers across its international branch network.

For a typical buyer evaluating these two brands, Lina Energy is the more defensible choice by default - not because of outstanding performance credentials, but because AKCOME's corporate structure is effectively non-functional following delisting and bankruptcy proceedings. Any buyer encountering AKCOME inventory should verify the supply chain carefully and confirm whether warranty obligations remain backed by a solvent entity. Lina Energy, while a smaller and less independently benchmarked brand, appears to be an operational company actively warranting its products.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/17/akcome-halts-some-manufacturing-faces-possible-chinese-stock-delisting/ \| AKCOME halts manufacturing, faces Chinese stock delisting - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| AKCOME Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| AKCOME Solar Panels Independent Review - Solar Choice \| review

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/lina-energy \| Lina Energy Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/lina-energy \| Lina Energy Technology Ltd. profile - ENF Solar \| article

Sources:

\- \[AKCOME halts manufacturing, faces Chinese stock delisting - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/17/akcome-halts-some-manufacturing-faces-possible-chinese-stock-delisting/)

\- \[AKCOME Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html)

\- \[AKCOME Solar Panels Independent Review - Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/)

\- \[Lina Energy Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/lina-energy)

\- \[Lina Energy Technology Ltd. profile - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/lina-energy)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Lina Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-lina-energy)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Lina Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-lina-energy)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Lina Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-lina-energy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-lina-energy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.