--- title: "AKCOME vs Kyocera - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AKCOME vs Kyocera solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-kyocera" --- # AKCOME vs Kyocera Kyocera has the broader catalog (8 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AKCOME | Kyocera | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | Japan | | Headquarters | Suzhou | Kyoto | | Founded | 2003 | 1959 | | Employees | | 77,136 | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | | | Listed | | TYO: 6971 | | Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://global.kyocera.com](https://global.kyocera.com) | Kyocera Corporation is a Japanese multinational electronics and ceramics manufacturer. Founded in 1959, the company produces a diverse range of products, including industrial ceramics, solar power generating systems, telecommunications equipment, and office document imaging equipment. Kyocera is committed to... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AKCOME | Kyocera | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 3 | 8 | +5 | | Max Power | 700 W | 410 W | +290 W | | Avg Power | 672 W | 302 W | +370 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AKCOME | Kyocera | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 21.00% | +1.54 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 18.21% | +3.42 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AKCOME | Kyocera | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.460%/°C | +0.220 | | Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 0 (0%) | +100 pp | | Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +5.0 yr | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | AKCOME | Kyocera | | --- | --- | --- | | 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 2 (25.0%) | | 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 0 | | \<20% | 0 | 5 (62.5%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 1 (12.5%) | ## Power distribution AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup) | Power band | AKCOME | Kyocera | | --- | --- | --- | | 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 | | \<400W | 0 | 6 (75.0%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 2 (25.0%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%) | Technology | AKCOME | Kyocera | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 | | Unknown | 0 | 8 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, AKCOME | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Kyocera | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [KT410W-108HL4](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [KT410W-108HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4b) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [KK280P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk280p-3cd3cg) | 280 | 17.0 | - | Polycrystalline | | 4 | [KK275P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk275p-3cd3cg) | 275 | 16.7 | - | Polycrystalline | | 5 | [KU270-6MCA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mca) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline | | 6 | [KU270-6MPA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mpa) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline | | 7 | [KK270P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk270p-3cd3cg) | 270 | 16.4 | - | Polycrystalline | | 8 | [KT230W-60HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt230w-60hl4b) | 230 | 20.8 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Kyocera is a Japanese conglomerate founded in Kyoto in 1959, originally as a ceramics company, that became one of the earliest industrial-scale solar manufacturers in the world - beginning mass production of multicrystalline silicon cells in 1982 and launching Japan's first residential solar system in 1993. Despite that long heritage, Kyocera has significantly contracted its solar footprint, exiting the North American market in 2016 and consolidating production to serve primarily Japan and select Asian markets. It is no longer considered a globally active manufacturer at scale, and current information does not place it on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists for international markets. AKCOME, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Jiangsu province, founded in 2006 and listed on the Shanghai stock exchange in 2010. The company appeared on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list as recently as 2022 but was reportedly removed from that ranking by 2024. It operates manufacturing bases across multiple Chinese cities and maintains commercial offices in Germany, Japan, South Korea, and Australia, giving it a broader active international footprint than Kyocera today. In terms of product focus, Kyocera's current domestic lineup centers on residential monocrystalline modules designed for the Japanese rooftop market, where it retains brand recognition built over decades. AKCOME has positioned itself around heterojunction (HJT) cell technology, announcing plans for large-scale HJT capacity, and markets a fully bifacial portfolio. Its panels are aimed at commercial and utility-scale projects globally, with reported average efficiencies in the competitive range for modern n-type products. AKCOME has also exported to markets including Australia and India. For most buyers outside Japan evaluating options in 2025, AKCOME is the more relevant choice simply because Kyocera is not commercially available in most international markets. Within Japan, Kyocera's decades-long domestic presence and proven field longevity remain genuine differentiators, but buyers elsewhere will find AKCOME - despite its lapsed Tier 1 status - the only practical option between the two. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/kyocera-solar-panels \| Kyocera Solar Panels 2026 Review - EcoWatch \| review \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/are-kyocera-solar-panels-any-good \| Are Kyocera Solar Panels Any Good - Solar Reviews \| review \- https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome \| AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV \| review \- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels Independent Review - Solar Choice \| review \- https://www.solarbeglobal.com/Akcome-plans-to-build-8-2-GW-HJT-production-plant-by-2024/ \| Akcome plans to build 8.2 GW HJT production plant by 2024 \| article Sources: \- \[Kyocera Solar Panels 2026 Review - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/kyocera-solar-panels) \- \[Are Kyocera Solar Panels Any Good - Solar Reviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/are-kyocera-solar-panels-any-good) \- \[AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome) \- \[Akcome Solar Panels Independent Review - Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/) \- \[Akcome plans to build 8.2 GW HJT production plant - Solarbe Global\](https://www.solarbeglobal.com/Akcome-plans-to-build-8-2-GW-HJT-production-plant-by-2024/) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Kyocera](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-kyocera) - [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Kyocera](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-kyocera) - [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs Kyocera](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-kyocera) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-kyocera Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.