---
title: "AKCOME vs Kensol - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs Kensol solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-kensol"
---

# AKCOME vs Kensol

Kensol has the broader catalog (21 vs 3 models). Kensol leads on peak efficiency at 23.00%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Poland |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Gliwice |
| Founded | 2003 | 2014 |
| Employees |  | null |
| Annual capacity |  | null GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://kensol.pl](https://kensol.pl) |

Kensol is a Polish company founded in 2014 that focuses on providing innovative, ecological, and economical solutions for the renewable energy sector. They design equipment tailored to the needs of the Polish market, specializing in photovoltaic (PV) and heating (HVAC) systems. Kensol offers modern and integrated...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | Kensol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 21 | +18 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 460 W | +240 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 437 W | +235 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | Kensol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 23.00% | +0.46 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 22.04% | +0.42 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | Kensol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.296%/°C | +0.056 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 17 (81%) | +19 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 29.0 yrs | +1.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Kensol skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 6 (28.6%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 11 (52.4%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 2 (9.5%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (9.5%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 1 (4.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 20 (95.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (29%)


| Technology | AKCOME | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 8 (38.1%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (28.6%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 5 (23.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 2 (9.5%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Kensol


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MNHTR2-BI-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-460) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MNHTR2-BI 460](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-460-1) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MNHTR2-BI-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-455) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MNHTR2-BI 455](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-455-1) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MNHTR2-BI-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-450) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [KS450MNHTR3-BI](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-ks450mnhtr3-bi) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MNHTR2-BI 450](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-450-1) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MNHTR2-BI-445](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-445) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [KS445MNHTR3-BI](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-ks445mnhtr3-bi) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MNHTR2-BI 445](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-445-1) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese solar module manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province that reached a peak annual production capacity of approximately 3.8 GW and appeared on BloombergNEF Tier 1 evaluation lists through early 2024. Its story since then is a cautionary one: a subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024, and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange terminated AKCOME's stock listing in August 2024 after shares fell below 1 yuan for 20 consecutive days. The company had been reporting net losses every year since 2019 - a consequence of chronic oversupply and price wars in the Chinese module industry. Kensol is a considerably smaller and more regionally focused operation: a Polish solar module brand created and owned by the KENO Group, a photovoltaic distributor active across eight European countries including Germany, Romania, Hungary, Norway, and the United Kingdom. Kensol holds no published BloombergNEF Tier 1 rating and does not approach AKCOME's former production scale; on historical institutional footprint, AKCOME once held the stronger position, though its current viability remains deeply uncertain.

At its peak, AKCOME was recognized for heterojunction (HJT) cell technology and produced high-wattage modules in the 655-700 W range, suited to utility-scale and large commercial ground-mount projects. Kensol's catalog centers on monocrystalline PERC modules in the 395-475 Wp range - a power class typical of residential rooftop and small-to-mid commercial installations. Kensol products carry TUV certification and are distributed primarily through the KENO Group's central European network, making them a regionally accessible choice for installers in Poland, Germany, and neighboring markets.

For a typical European buyer in 2025, Kensol is the more defensible default between the two, not on technological grounds but because AKCOME's unresolved insolvency situation makes long-term warranty continuity genuinely uncertain. Buyers requiring high-wattage modules for large utility projects would ordinarily select a manufacturer with stable operations, but of these two brands, Kensol at least represents an actively operating company with a functioning supply chain.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/07/30/chinese-pv-industry-brief-akcome-provides-update-on-restructuring-process/ \| AKCOME restructuring update - pv magazine July 2024 \| article

\- https://energynews.oedigital.com/environment/2024/07/30/chinese-solar-company-akcomes-subsidiary-declares-personal-bankruptcy-amidst-plunging-prices-overcapacity \| AKCOME subsidiary bankruptcy amid oversupply - OE Digital \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome solar panels independent review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/kensol \| Kensol Sp. z o.o. panel directory - ENF Solar \| article

\- https://xpert.digital/en/the-keno-group/ \| The Keno Group - European PV market analysis and activities \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Kensol](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-kensol)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Kensol](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-kensol)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Kensol](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-kensol)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-kensol

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.