---
title: "AKCOME vs Jolywood - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs Jolywood solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-jolywood"
---

# AKCOME vs Jolywood

Jolywood has the broader catalog (128 vs 3 models). Jolywood leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Taizhou |
| Founded | 2003 | 2008 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 300393 |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.jolywood.cn](https://www.jolywood.cn) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 128 | +125 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 715 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 554 W | +118 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 23.60% | +1.06 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 22.54% | +0.92 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.284%/°C | +0.044 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 110 (86%) | +14 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jolywood skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 11 (8.6%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 89 (69.5%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 28 (21.9%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 40 (31.2%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 8 (6.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 42 (32.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 38 (29.7%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (95%)


| Technology | AKCOME | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 122 (95.3%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (4.7%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jolywood


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JW-HD132N-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JW-HD132N-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JW-HD132N-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JW-HD132N-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JW-HD132N-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JW-HD132N-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JW-HD132N-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JW-HD132N-695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Jolywood is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2008 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2014. It is widely credited as one of the earliest large-scale pioneers of n-type TOPCon cell technology, operating a reported 16 GW TOPCon cell factory in Shanxi province. Bloomberg NEF has listed Jolywood as a Tier 1 module supplier, though PV ModuleTech placed it in the lower CCC+ bankability tier in its Q2 2024 ratings, reflecting some competitive and financial pressures. AKCOME was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu Province, with annual module capacity reported around 3.8 GW. The company has historically carried Tier 1 recognition, but was delisted from the TaiyangNews TOP SOLAR MODULES ranking in early 2025 after its website became inaccessible, raising questions about its current institutional standing. On balance, Jolywood has the stronger and more consistently documented global footprint.

Jolywood's catalog centers on bifacial n-type TOPCon panels suited to utility-scale ground mounts and demanding commercial rooftop installations, including a purpose-built windproof series targeting harsh-environment deployments with efficiencies up to approximately 23%. AKCOME has carved out a distinct niche as one of the few manufacturers fully committed to heterojunction (HJT) technology, with modules reported above 730 W and conversion efficiencies approaching 24% on flagship lines. It also retains a PERC range. HJT's higher low-light performance and lower temperature coefficient make AKCOME's products particularly attractive for residential and premium commercial projects where energy yield per square meter is the priority.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Jolywood is the safer institutional choice given its larger production base, broader project finance track record, and continued R&D investment including back-contact cell development. AKCOME is compelling for buyers who specifically want HJT technology from a specialist producer, but the recent visibility issues warrant additional due diligence on supply chain continuity and after-sales support before committing to a large installation.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/jolywood-solar-panel-review/ \| Jolywood Solar Panels - Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/27/jolywood-releases-595-w-bifacial-topcon-solar-panel-for-harsh-environments/ \| Jolywood releases 595 W bifacial TOPCon panel for harsh environments \| article

\- https://7sun.eu/pv-moduletech-bankability-ratings-q2-2024/ \| PV ModuleTech Bankability Ratings Q2 2024 \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/ \| AKCOME Solar Panels - HJT PV Modules overview \| article

Sources:

\- \[Jolywood Solar Panels - Independent Review by Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/jolywood-solar-panel-review/)

\- \[Jolywood releases 595 W bifacial TOPCon panel for harsh environments - pv magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/27/jolywood-releases-595-w-bifacial-topcon-solar-panel-for-harsh-environments/)

\- \[PV ModuleTech Bankability Ratings Q2 2024\](https://7sun.eu/pv-moduletech-bankability-ratings-q2-2024/)

\- \[Akcome Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html)

\- \[AKCOME Solar Panels - HJT PV Modules overview\](https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jolywood)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jolywood)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-jolywood)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-jolywood

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.