---
title: "AKCOME vs Hansol - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs Hansol solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-hansol"
---

# AKCOME vs Hansol

Hansol has the broader catalog (22 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | Hansol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Seoul |
| Founded | 2003 | 1965 |
| Employees |  | 11,000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 0-1 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  | Korea Stock Exchange (KRX): 004150 |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.hansol.com](https://www.hansol.com) |

Hansol Group is a South Korean conglomerate (chaebol) with core operations in paper manufacturing, chemicals, logistics, IT solutions, and home decoration. The group was founded in 1965 and separated from Samsung Group in 1991. Hansol operates through a network of subsidiaries emphasizing innovation and sustainability.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | Hansol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 22 | +19 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 360 W | +340 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 336 W | +336 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | Hansol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 18.05% | +4.49 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 17.10% | +4.53 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | Hansol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.445%/°C | +0.205 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 0 (0%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +5.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | Hansol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (100.0%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | Hansol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 22 (100.0%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | AKCOME | Hansol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 22 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Hansol


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TD-AN3](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3) | 360 | 18.1 | -0.420 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TD-AN3-360](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-360) | 360 | 18.1 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TD-AN3 360W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-360w) | 360 | 18.1 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TD-AN3-355](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-355) | 355 | 17.8 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TD-AN3 355W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-355w) | 355 | 17.8 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TD-AN3-350](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-350) | 350 | 17.6 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TD-AN3 350W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-350w) | 350 | 17.6 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TD-AN3-345](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-345) | 345 | 17.3 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TD-AN3 345W](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-345w) | 345 | 17.3 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TD-AN3-340](https://comparepv.com/panel/hansol-td-an3-340) | 340 | 17.1 | -0.450 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province, founded as part of the broader Akcome Group which spans solar cells, modules, and mounting structures. It holds Tier 1 bankability status according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance, and its module manufacturing capacity is reported at approximately 3.8 GW per year, with substantially larger cell capacity expansions announced for coming years. Hansol Solar, a division of Hansol Technics within South Korea's Hansol Group, entered the solar module business around 2010 and operates primarily from a facility in Ochang, South Korea, with a reported annual module capacity in the range of 600 MW or above. Hansol Technics appeared on Tier 1 lists as recently as 2019, but its more recent bankability standing is less clearly confirmed in current industry sources. In terms of sheer manufacturing scale and institutional financing track record, AKCOME carries the heavier footprint.

On the technology side, AKCOME has positioned itself as an HJT and TOPCon specialist, marketing high-power bifacial modules - its flagship HJT line has reached outputs as high as 730 W - which makes it most relevant for utility-scale and large commercial ground-mount applications where high wattage and bifacial gain matter most. Hansol's publicly visible product catalog, as reflected on platforms like EnergySage, has historically featured lower-wattage residential and light commercial modules, and the company recently restructured its solar module operations into a dedicated subsidiary, suggesting the product line may be in transition. No confirmed shift to TOPCon or HJT for Hansol's current mainstream catalog could be found in available sources.

For a typical buyer in 2025, AKCOME is the more scalable and technologically current choice for commercial or utility-scale procurement, provided supply chain continuity concerns - including a brief period when its website became inaccessible flagged by industry trackers in early 2025 - are due-diligenced. Hansol may appeal to buyers in South Korea or nearby markets who prioritize locally manufactured product and closer manufacturer relationships for residential installations, but it is the smaller and less internationally prominent of the two.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| AKCOME Solar Panels - Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome \| AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026 - Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

\- https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/ \| AKCOME Solar Panel HJT producer profile \| article

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/hansol/ \| Hansol Solar Panels - EnergySage Buyer Guide \| review

\- https://en.sedaily.com/finance/2026/02/06/hansol-technics-restructures-business-with-new-solar-module \| Hansol Technics Restructures Business with New Solar Module Subsidiary \| article

Sources:

\- \[AKCOME Solar Panels - Independent Review by Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/)

\- \[AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome)

\- \[AKCOME HJT producer profile - hjtpv.com\](https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/)

\- \[Hansol Solar Panels - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/hansol/)

\- \[Hansol Technics Restructures Business - Seoul Economic Daily\](https://en.sedaily.com/finance/2026/02/06/hansol-technics-restructures-business-with-new-solar-module)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Hansol](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hansol)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Hansol](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hansol)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Hansol](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-hansol)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-hansol

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

