---
title: "AKCOME vs GL Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs GL Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-gl-solar"
---

# AKCOME vs GL Solar

GL Solar has the broader catalog (13 vs 3 models). GL Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | GL Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Italy |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Marcianise |
| Founded | 2003 | 2000 |
| Employees |  | 1-10 |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.glsolarenergy.it](https://www.glsolarenergy.it) |

GL Solar Energy s.r.l. is a small Italian company based in Marcianise (Caserta) specializing in the design, production, and installation of photovoltaic systems for residential and industrial applications. The company also distributes solar panels and related equipment, working with major international brands such as...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | GL Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 13 | +10 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 640 W | +60 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 603 W | +69 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | GL Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 23.60% | +1.06 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 22.61% | +0.98 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | GL Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.274%/°C | +0.034 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 13 (100%) |  |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

GL Solar skews to higher efficiency: 38% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | GL Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 3 (23.1%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 5 (38.5%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 5 (38.5%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | GL Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 10 (76.9%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 0 | 1 (7.7%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 2 (15.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (54%)


| Technology | AKCOME | GL Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 7 (53.8%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 6 (46.2%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, GL Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [3SHBGH-C#-640](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-640) | 640 | 22.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [3SHBGH-C#-635](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-635) | 635 | 22.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [3SHBGH-C#-630](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-630) | 630 | 22.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [3SHBGH-C#-625](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-625) | 625 | 22.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [3SHBGH-C#-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-620) | 620 | 21.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [3SHBGH-C#-615](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-615) | 615 | 21.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [3SHBGH-C#-610](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-3shbgh-c-610) | 610 | 21.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-NT10/72GDF-610W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-hy-nt10-72gdf-610w) | 610 | 23.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-NT10/72GDF-605W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-hy-nt10-72gdf-605w) | 605 | 23.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-NT10/72GDF-600W](https://comparepv.com/panel/gl-solar-hy-nt10-72gdf-600w) | 600 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

GL Solar is an Italian manufacturer established around 2000 and headquartered in Marcianise, Campania, Italy. It focuses on designing and producing photovoltaic modules primarily for stand-alone and smaller-scale applications, and also operates a regional distribution arm serving the Italian and broader Southern European market. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability designation has been identified for GL Solar in available sources, and public information on its annual production volume is scarce, indicating a relatively modest operational scale. AKCOME, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2006, publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2010, and headquartered in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province. AKCOME holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and has announced planned cell capacity of 8.8 GW at its Changxing facility, with commercial presence across more than 30 countries and over 6,000 employees. On institutional footprint, AKCOME is the considerably larger and more widely recognized of the two.

AKCOME's current product catalog centers on N-type technologies - specifically HJT (heterojunction) and TOPCon lines, alongside legacy PERC-based modules - and covers both residential rooftop and utility-scale ground-mount segments. Its Kookaburra series has gained documented traction in the Australian market, and its higher-wattage bifacial dual-glass configurations are positioned for commercial and large-scale deployments. Independent testing cites module efficiencies reaching approximately 22.5 percent for its TOPCon models, and the company offers a 30-year performance warranty with a 15-year product warranty on select lines. GL Solar's catalog, based on available public information, appears oriented toward off-grid, stand-alone, and smaller residential applications in Southern Europe, with no independently reviewed product specifications surfacing from credible industry sources.

For most buyers planning a grid-tied residential or commercial installation in 2025, AKCOME is the more defensible choice of the two - backed by Tier 1 bankability, broader distribution, and a documented N-type product roadmap. GL Solar may suit buyers in Italy or adjacent markets who need local-language support and smaller-batch supply, but the absence of independent reviews and Tier 1 recognition makes it a difficult recommendation for any financed or large-scale project.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels: An Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome \| AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons & Specs - ComparePV \| review

\- https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/ \| AKCOME Solar Panels - HJT PV Modules Overview \| article

\- https://www.ecogeneration.com.au/akcome-achieves-25-6-per-cent-hjt-cell-efficiency/ \| Akcome achieves 25.6 per cent HJT cell efficiency - Ecogeneration \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs GL Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-gl-solar)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs GL Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-gl-solar)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs GL Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-gl-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-gl-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.