---
title: "AKCOME vs CEEG - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs CEEG solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-ceeg"
---

# AKCOME vs CEEG

AKCOME has the broader catalog (3 vs 0 models). AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | CEEG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Nanjing |
| Founded | 2003 | 1990 |
| Employees |  | 4000+ |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [http://www.ceeg.cn](http://www.ceeg.cn) |

CEEG (China Electric Equipment Group Co., Ltd.) is a leading company in China's Power Transmission and Distribution (PT&D) industry. With over three decades of expertise, they deliver tailor-made transformer solutions and are known for local compatibility in PT&D and renewable energy sectors. Their diverse product...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | CEEG | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 0 | +3 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 0 W | +700 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 0 W | +672 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | CEEG | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | CEEG | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 0 (0%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | CEEG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | CEEG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | AKCOME | CEEG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs CEEG](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ceeg)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs CEEG](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ceeg)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs CEEG](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-ceeg)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-ceeg

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.