--- title: "AKCOME vs BYD - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AKCOME vs BYD solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-byd" --- # AKCOME vs BYD BYD has the broader catalog (115 vs 3 models). BYD leads on peak efficiency at 23.66%. ## The two companies | Attribute | AKCOME | BYD | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Suzhou | Shenzhen | | Founded | 2003 | 1995 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | yes | | Listed | | SZSE: 002594 | | Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.byd.com](https://www.byd.com) | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AKCOME | BYD | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 3 | 115 | +112 | | Max Power | 700 W | 735 W | +35 W | | Avg Power | 672 W | 565 W | +107 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AKCOME | BYD | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 23.66% | +1.12 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 21.84% | +0.22 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AKCOME | BYD | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.299%/°C | +0.059 | | Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 109 (95%) | +5 pp | | Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.5 yrs | +1.5 yr | ## Efficiency distribution BYD skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AKCOME | BYD | | --- | --- | --- | | 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 28 (24.3%) | | 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 53 (46.1%) | | \<20% | 0 | 5 (4.3%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 12 (10.4%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 17 (14.8%) | ## Power distribution AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup) | Power band | AKCOME | BYD | | --- | --- | --- | | 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 34 (29.6%) | | 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 13 (11.3%) | | \<400W | 0 | 4 (3.5%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 33 (28.7%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 31 (27.0%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (63%) | Technology | AKCOME | BYD | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 13 (11.3%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 72 (62.6%) | | PERC | 0 | 30 (26.1%) | ## Top panels, AKCOME | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, BYD | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HSBK-33-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HSBK-33-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HSBK-33-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HSBK-33-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [NSBK-33-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [NSBK-33-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HSBK-33-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [NSBK-33-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HSBK-33-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [NSBK-33-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary BYD is a Chinese manufacturing conglomerate headquartered in Shenzhen, founded in 1995 by Wang Chuanfu. Originally built around lithium battery production, BYD has grown into one of the world's largest makers of electric vehicles and energy storage systems, with solar panels representing one division within a much broader industrial portfolio. The company was added to the BloombergNEF Tier 1 module manufacturer list in 2025, signaling growing institutional recognition. AKCOME, by contrast, is a more specialized solar manufacturer founded in China in 2006, with a reported annual module capacity of approximately 3.8 GW. AKCOME achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status around 2022 but was subsequently removed from that list by the 2024 update cycle. Between the two, BYD carries the stronger institutional footprint simply by virtue of its scale as a global conglomerate with deep capital reserves. BYD's solar product range is wide, covering residential through utility-scale applications with output spanning roughly 380 W to 730 W, and the company has confirmed deployment of both TOPCon and HJT cell technologies alongside bifacial configurations. This breadth makes BYD suited to diverse project types, from rooftop residential installs to large ground-mounted arrays. AKCOME has historically emphasized HJT technology as a longer-term differentiator, describing it as delivering superior performance in low-light and high-temperature conditions, while also producing TOPCon modules as its mainstream commercial offering. However, AKCOME's HJT modules were delisted from the TaiyangNews top-modules tracking list in January 2025 due to website accessibility issues, and the brand did not appear among top performers in PVEL independent reliability testing in 2024 - both signals worth weighing. For a typical buyer in 2025, BYD is the more defensible default. Its Tier 1 recognition, broader product ecosystem, and backing from a financially robust parent company reduce bankability risk. AKCOME may appeal to buyers specifically seeking HJT technology at a competitive price point, but the recent delisting events introduce uncertainty that a risk-averse procurer should not ignore. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels - Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review \- https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome \| AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026 - Pros, Cons and Specs \| review \- https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/ \| Akcome Technology on HJT cell production and copper plating \| article \- https://solartechonline.com/blog/byd-solar-panels-guide-2025/ \| BYD Solar Panels - Complete 2025 Guide to Performance and Pricing \| review \- https://www.vicoexport.com/en/64212/tier-1-solar-panel-manufacturers-list-q4-2025/ \| Tier 1 Solar Panel Manufacturers List - Q4 2025 \| article Sources: \- \[Akcome Solar Panels Review - Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/) \- \[AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome) \- \[Akcome Technology on HJT cell production - PV Tech\](https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/) \- \[BYD Solar Panels Complete 2025 Guide - SolarTechOnline\](https://solartechonline.com/blog/byd-solar-panels-guide-2025/) \- \[Tier 1 Solar Panel Manufacturers List Q4 2025 - Vicoexport\](https://www.vicoexport.com/en/64212/tier-1-solar-panel-manufacturers-list-q4-2025/) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs BYD](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-byd) - [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs BYD](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-byd) - [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs BYD](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-byd) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-byd Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.