--- title: "AKCOME vs Bruk-Bet - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AKCOME vs Bruk-Bet solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-bruk-bet" --- # AKCOME vs Bruk-Bet Bruk-Bet has the broader catalog (20 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AKCOME | Bruk-Bet | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | Poland | | Headquarters | Suzhou | Nieciecza | | Founded | 2003 | 1984 | | Employees | | 1000+ | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [http://www.solar.bruk-bet.pl](http://www.solar.bruk-bet.pl) | Bruk-Bet Fotowoltaika is a leading Polish manufacturer of photovoltaic (PV) and BIPV modules, and part of the larger Bruk-Bet Group. The company has been operating in the construction industry since 1984 and has been active in renewable energy since 2011. Bruk-Bet is known for its high-quality building solutions and... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AKCOME | Bruk-Bet | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 3 | 20 | +17 | | Max Power | 700 W | 480 W | +220 W | | Avg Power | 672 W | 416 W | +255 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AKCOME | Bruk-Bet | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 22.17% | +0.37 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 20.80% | +0.83 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AKCOME | Bruk-Bet | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.324%/°C | +0.084 | | Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 4 (20%) | +80 pp | | Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 26.5 yrs | +3.5 yr | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | AKCOME | Bruk-Bet | | --- | --- | --- | | 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 5 (25.0%) | | 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 2 (10.0%) | | \<20% | 0 | 2 (10.0%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 11 (55.0%) | ## Power distribution AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup) | Power band | AKCOME | Bruk-Bet | | --- | --- | --- | | 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 | | \<400W | 0 | 7 (35.0%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 13 (65.0%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%) | Technology | AKCOME | Bruk-Bet | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 | | PERC | 0 | 15 (75.0%) | | N-type | 0 | 3 (15.0%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 2 (10.0%) | ## Top panels, AKCOME | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Bruk-Bet | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [PEM.GB-480 N-Type](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-480-n-type) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [PEM.GB-480](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-480) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [PEM.GB-470 N-Type](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-470-n-type) | 470 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [PEM.GB-470](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-470) | 470 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [PEM.WB-465](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-465) | 465 | 21.3 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [PEM.WB-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-460) | 460 | 21.1 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [PEM.WS-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-ws-460) | 460 | 21.1 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [PEM.WS-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-ws-455) | 455 | 20.8 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [PEM.BB-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-bb-450) | 450 | 20.6 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [PEM.WB-410](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-410) | 410 | 20.8 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province that built itself into a multi-gigawatt-scale supplier over roughly two decades, producing both solar cells and modules. It previously held Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status and reported module capacity of around 3.8 GW as of the early 2020s. However, AKCOME's institutional standing has collapsed sharply: the company recorded net losses every year from 2019 onward, halted production across several subsidiaries in mid-2024, and was delisted from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2024 after its share price fell below the minimum threshold for 20 consecutive trading days. A subsidiary was subsequently placed into court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization. Bruk-Bet is a Polish manufacturer based in Tarnow and part of the broader BRUK-BET construction group, which has operated for over 38 years. Its solar division is a small-scale regional player with annual module production capacity of around 120 MW - three orders of magnitude smaller than AKCOME at its peak - and does not appear on published Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 lists. On institutional footprint, AKCOME had the stronger global presence historically, though that standing is now severely compromised. On the product side, AKCOME's portfolio was built around n-type technologies, offering TOPCon modules under the AK iTopper line and HJT modules under the AK iPower line aimed at utility and high-performance commercial segments. Bruk-Bet focuses on PERC half-cut monocrystalline modules in the BEM series, covering outputs suited to residential rooftops and small commercial systems in the Polish and broader Central European market. Bruk-Bet also produces full-black aesthetic variants for design-conscious residential buyers. For a typical buyer in 2025, neither brand offers a straightforward recommendation in its current state. AKCOME's warranty continuity is genuinely uncertain given the ongoing insolvency proceedings, making it a poor choice regardless of technology quality. Bruk-Bet is a stable but limited regional option - suitable for buyers in Poland who prioritize local supply chain and European manufacturing, but not positioned as a globally competitive tier-one choice. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/21/chinese-pv-industry-brief-akcome-confirms-delisting-from-the-shenzhen-stock-market/ \| AKCOME confirms delisting from the Shenzhen stock market - pv magazine \| article \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/17/akcome-halts-some-manufacturing-faces-possible-chinese-stock-delisting/ \| Akcome halts some manufacturing, faces possible Chinese stock delisting \| article \- https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/ \| Akcome Technology on HJT cell production and copper plating processes \| article \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2017/06/06/polish-module-maker-bruk-bet-solar-raises-annual-capacity-to-120-mw/ \| Polish module maker Bruk-Bet Solar raises annual capacity to 120 MW \| article \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome Solar Panels - Independent Review \| review Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Bruk-Bet](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-bruk-bet) - [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Bruk-Bet](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-bruk-bet) - [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs Bruk-Bet](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-bruk-bet) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-bruk-bet Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.