--- title: "AKCOME vs AmoSolar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AKCOME vs AmoSolar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-amosolar" --- # AKCOME vs AmoSolar AmoSolar has the broader catalog (77 vs 3 models). AmoSolar leads on peak efficiency at 22.83%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AKCOME | AmoSolar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | | | Headquarters | Suzhou | | | Founded | 2003 | | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AKCOME | AmoSolar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 3 | 77 | +74 | | Max Power | 700 W | 675 W | +25 W | | Avg Power | 672 W | 522 W | +150 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AKCOME | AmoSolar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 22.83% | +0.29 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 21.14% | +0.49 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AKCOME | AmoSolar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.339%/°C | +0.099 | | Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 17 (22%) | +78 pp | | Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 26.5 yrs | +3.5 yr | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | AKCOME | AmoSolar | | --- | --- | --- | | 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 41 (53.2%) | | 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 6 (7.8%) | | \<20% | 0 | 1 (1.3%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 29 (37.7%) | ## Power distribution AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup) | Power band | AKCOME | AmoSolar | | --- | --- | --- | | 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 18 (23.4%) | | 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 | | \<400W | 0 | 8 (10.4%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 25 (32.5%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 26 (33.8%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (86%) | Technology | AKCOME | AmoSolar | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 | | PERC | 0 | 66 (85.7%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 11 (14.3%) | ## Top panels, AKCOME | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, AmoSolar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [AS675G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as675g12-132) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [AS675G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as675g12-120) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [AS670G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as670g12-132) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [AS670G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as670g12-120) | 670 | 21.5 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [AS665G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as665g12-132) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [AS665G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as665g12-120) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [AS660G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as660g12-132) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [AS660G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as660g12-120) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [AS655G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as655g12-132) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [AS655G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as655g12-120) | 655 | 21.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AmoSolar is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2008 and headquartered in Hefei, Anhui Province, producing both photovoltaic modules and solar batteries with an integrated solar-storage strategy. Available reporting does not confirm current BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for AmoSolar, though the company cites international certifications such as ISO, CE, IEC and TUV and reports annual module output above 3 GW with a stated roadmap toward 10 GW of combined solar-storage capacity, and exports to over 120 countries. AKCOME, formally Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology, is an older and more established player, founded in 2006, listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2011, and headquartered in Zhejiang Province with major manufacturing in Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu. AKCOME previously held BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status but was reportedly delisted from that tracking list in early 2025, and its historical peak annual production capacity has been cited around 3.8 GW. On institutional footprint, AKCOME has the longer public-market track record and a stronger historical bankability pedigree, even accounting for its recent Tier 1 delisting, while AmoSolar reads as the newer, faster-growing challenger brand. Product-wise, AmoSolar positions itself around complete on-grid, off-grid and hybrid systems spanning residential and commercial rooftops, pairing panels with its own battery lines for buyers who want a single-vendor solar-plus-storage package. AKCOME has leaned more toward higher-wattage modules, with recent catalogues centered on 655W-700W panels aimed at utility-scale and large commercial ground-mount projects, and reported module efficiencies up to roughly 22.5 percent. On cell technology, AKCOME has publicly committed to TOPCon as its mainstream product line while continuing R&D investment in HJT and HJT-perovskite tandem cells, including a $140 million facility announced in 2024; comparable public detail on AmoSolar's dominant cell technology was not found in available sources. For a typical 2025-2026 buyer, the choice depends on project type: AKCOME's TOPCon-focused, high-wattage utility modules and longer bankability history make it a more conventional pick for large ground-mount or commercial installations, though its 2025 Tier 1 delisting warrants a fresh bankability check with a lender before committing. AmoSolar's combined panel-plus-storage offering may suit residential or hybrid-system buyers who value a single integrated supplier, but its Tier 1 status and cell-technology specifics are less publicly documented, so distributors should request current certification and bankability evidence directly. The two brands are not simply interchangeable; they lean toward different project segments. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/ \| Akcome Technology on HJT cell production and copper plating processes \| article \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome Solar Panels Review \| review \- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels: An Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/amosolar \| AmoSolar Co., Ltd. company profile \| article \- https://www.perovskite-info.com/jiangsu-akcome-science-and-technology \| Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology company profile \| article Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs AmoSolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-amosolar) - [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs AmoSolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-amosolar) - [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs AmoSolar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-amosolar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-amosolar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.