---
title: "AKCOME vs Amerisolar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs Amerisolar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-amerisolar"
---

# AKCOME vs Amerisolar

Amerisolar has the broader catalog (27 vs 3 models). Amerisolar leads on peak efficiency at 22.83%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | Amerisolar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2003 | 1993 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  | 9 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.weamerisolar.com](https://www.weamerisolar.com) |

Amerisolar, operating under Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing Group, is a professional solar PV module manufacturer with over 30 years of experience in production and quality control. The company operates manufacturing facilities across China, the USA, Vietnam, South Korea, and other countries, and serves markets...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | Amerisolar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 27 | +24 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 665 W | +35 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 546 W | +126 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | Amerisolar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 22.83% | +0.29 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 21.12% | +0.51 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | Amerisolar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.340%/°C | +0.100 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 0 (0%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | Amerisolar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 9 (33.3%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 5 (18.5%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 2 (7.4%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 11 (40.7%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | Amerisolar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 6 (22.2%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 0 | 8 (29.6%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 13 (48.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (74%)


| Technology | AKCOME | Amerisolar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 20 (74.1%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 7 (25.9%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Amerisolar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AS-8M132-HC-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AS-8M132-HC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AS-8M132-HC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AS-8M132-HC-650W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-650w) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AS-8M132-HC-645W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-645w) | 645 | 20.8 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AS-8M132-HC-640W](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-8m132-hc-640w) | 640 | 20.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AS-7M144N-HC-590](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-590) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AS-7M144N-HC-585](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-585) | 585 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AS-7M144N-HC-580](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AS-7M144N-HC-575](https://comparepv.com/panel/artsolar-as-7m144n-hc-575) | 575 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Amerisolar, trading under Worldwide Energy and Manufacturing USA Co., Ltd., was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Shanghai, China, with additional manufacturing capacity in Taiwan and Portugal. Despite its American-facing brand identity, it is fundamentally a Chinese-rooted module maker targeting international commercial and utility markets. Current search results do not confirm an active BloombergNEF Tier 1 classification for the brand, and at least one third-party field test raised quality-control concerns, placing it in the mid-tier segment for project-finance purposes. AKCOME, formally Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd., was founded in 2006, is listed on the Chinese Stock Exchange, and reports operations across more than 30 countries with over 6,000 employees. It held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in 2022 but was removed from subsequent rankings - a signal that lenders and EPC firms should note. On overall institutional profile, AKCOME carries the broader footprint, though neither brand sits alongside the top-tier global giants.

Amerisolar's catalog has historically targeted budget-conscious commercial and small utility buyers, with products generally positioned as cost-competitive polycrystalline and standard monocrystalline modules. Its specific cell-technology roadmap for 2025 is not clearly confirmed in current sources, so technology claims should be verified directly with the company. AKCOME, by contrast, has made heterojunction technology - HJT - its clearest strategic differentiator, with pv-magazine reporting mass-production HJT cell efficiency reaching 25.6%. This positions AKCOME toward buyers willing to pay a modest premium for higher-efficiency, bifacial panels suited to constrained-roof residential installs and mid-scale commercial rooftop projects where energy density matters.

For a typical buyer in 2025, AKCOME is the more defensible default of the two, given its documented HJT specialization, wider international distribution network, and prior Tier 1 recognition - even if that status has since lapsed. Amerisolar may appeal where upfront module cost is the dominant constraint, but buyers financing larger projects should scrutinize warranty-claim track records carefully before committing at scale. Neither brand is a substitute for the top-five global manufacturers when bankability and long-term service infrastructure are critical.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/amerisolar \| Amerisolar solar panels - SolarReviews independent review \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/amerisolar/ \| Amerisolar solar panels - EnergySage profile and ratings \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/25-6-akcome-pushes-its-mass-production-hjt-cell-efficiency-to-a-new-high/ \| Akcome pushes mass-production HJT cell efficiency to 25.6% - pv-magazine \| article

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome solar panels independent review - Solar Choice Australia \| review

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome \| AKCOME solar panels review 2026 - ComparePV \| review

Sources:

\- \[Amerisolar solar panels - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/amerisolar)

\- \[Amerisolar solar panels - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/amerisolar/)

\- \[Akcome pushes HJT cell efficiency to 25.6% - pv-magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/25-6-akcome-pushes-its-mass-production-hjt-cell-efficiency-to-a-new-high/)

\- \[Akcome solar panels review - Solar Choice Australia\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/)

\- \[AKCOME solar panels review 2026 - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Amerisolar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-amerisolar)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Amerisolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-amerisolar)
- [AKCOME vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Amerisolar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-amerisolar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-amerisolar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.