---
title: "AKCOME vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AKCOME vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko"
---

# AKCOME vs AIKO

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 3 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AKCOME | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Suzhou | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2003 | 2009 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 600732 |
| Website | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AKCOME | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 3 | 144 | +141 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 805 W | +105 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W | 581 W | +90 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AKCOME | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 25.20% | +2.66 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 23.65% | +2.02 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AKCOME | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C | -0.271%/°C | +0.031 |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) | 35 (24%) | +76 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 29.5 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AKCOME | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 2 (66.7%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 22-23% | 1 (33.3%) | 12 (8.3%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 123 (85.4%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | AKCOME | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (66.7%) | 78 (54.2%) |
| 700W+ | 1 (33.3%) | 9 (6.2%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 2 (1.4%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 50 (34.7%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 5 (3.5%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | AKCOME | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 3 (100.0%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) |
| N-type | 0 | 17 (11.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 7 (4.9%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer founded in 2009, with production bases across several provinces and an R&D center in Freiburg, Germany. It holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable status, confirming the financial credibility required for large-scale project financing. AKCOME (Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology) was founded in 2006, listed on the Chinese stock exchange in 2010, and serves customers in more than 30 countries. However, AKCOME was removed from the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list in recent rankings, and its subsidiary Zhejiang Akcome Photoelectricity Technology filed for bankruptcy in 2024 amid industry-wide margin compression. On institutional credibility and bankability, AIKO currently holds the stronger position by a clear margin.

AIKO's flagship product line is built around its ABC (All Back Contact) cell platform, which places both electrical contacts on the rear of the cell, reducing shading losses and enabling module efficiencies above 24 percent on the Neostar series - making it well suited to premium residential rooftops and space-constrained commercial installations where power density justifies the price. The company has announced capacity expansions targeting more than 11 GW of ABC production. AKCOME is an HJT specialist, with its current catalog relying entirely on heterojunction cells; modules range from around 655 W to 700 W, with average efficiencies reported at roughly 21.6 percent and top models reaching 22.5 percent. AKCOME has also piloted perovskite cell research, signaling longer-term ambitions, though its near-term commercial story is clouded by the financial situation noted above. Its 30-year performance warranty is notable on paper but carries reduced weight given the ongoing difficulties at a subsidiary level.

For a typical buyer in 2025, AIKO is the more defensible default. Its Tier 1 status, efficiency lead, and expanding production scale make it easier to finance and underwrite than AKCOME. One caveat worth noting: AIKO's product warranty stands at 15 years, shorter than the 25-year standard common among larger Tier 1 rivals, which matters for long-horizon projects. AKCOME's HJT technology is credible in itself, but the Tier 1 delisting and bankruptcy filing at a subsidiary introduce risks that most buyers should weigh carefully before committing.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-capacity-upgrades-abc-cell-technology/ \| Aiko steps up ABC transition with 11 GW capacity upgrade \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| AIKO solar panel review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| AKCOME solar panels - independent review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/01/02/chinese-pv-industry-brief-akcome-sets-up-pilot-factory-for-perovskite-pv-cells/ \| AKCOME sets up pilot factory for perovskite PV cells - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome \| AKCOME solar panels review 2026 - ComparePV \| review

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [ARTsolar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs ASM](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-asm)
- [AU Optronics vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-aiko)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.