---
title: "AIKO vs Zonergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Zonergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-zonergy"
---

# AIKO vs Zonergy

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 5 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Zigong, Sichuan |
| Founded | 2009 | 2007 |
| Employees |  | 201-300 |
| Annual capacity |  | null GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [http://www.zonergy.com](http://www.zonergy.com) |

Zonergy is a world-renowned enterprise specializing in smart microgrid integrated solutions. The company is committed to providing first-class smart micro-grid solutions for global customers, covering technology research and development, product production, sales and trade, engineering design and implementation, and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 5 | +139 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 460 W | +345 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 450 W | +131 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 21.16% | +4.04 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 20.70% | +2.95 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.350%/°C | +0.079 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 0 (0%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +4.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 4 (80.0%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 1 (20.0%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | AIKO | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Zonergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZPM 460MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-460mh3-72) | 460 | 21.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZPM 455MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-455mh3-72) | 455 | 20.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZPM 450MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-450mh3-72) | 450 | 20.7 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZPM 445MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-445mh3-72) | 445 | 20.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZPM 440MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-440mh3-72) | 440 | 20.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, founded in 2009, and recognized in 2024 with Tier 1 status by BloombergNEF, placing it among a small group of financially bankable module makers. Zonergy is also a Chinese energy conglomerate, headquartered in Zigong, Sichuan, founded in 2007, with a broader footprint spanning solar, biomass, and microgrid projects, including its role developing the large-scale Bahawalpur solar park in Pakistan under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Public sourcing on Zonergy's module-specific Tier 1 or BloombergNEF bankability standing is thin compared to AIKO, and AIKO's explicit BloombergNEF inclusion gives it the stronger, more verifiable institutional footprint in the module supply space specifically.

AIKO's product line centers on its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) N-type cell technology, which it pioneered and uses across its Neostar residential and commercial panel series, emphasizing high efficiency, a clean all-black aesthetic with no visible front-side connectors, and strong shading tolerance. This positions AIKO primarily toward premium residential and commercial rooftop installations where efficiency and appearance matter. Zonergy's business is more diversified and project-driven, with a track record skewed toward utility-scale and large infrastructure deployments such as integrated solar-storage microgrids and government-backed solar parks, rather than a narrow, branded residential product line; independent, detailed technical reviews of its panel specifications are comparatively scarce in English-language industry media.

For a typical residential or small commercial buyer in 2025, AIKO is the more straightforward default, given its documented Tier 1 bankability, distinctive and well-reviewed ABC technology, and an established retail-facing product review ecosystem. Zonergy may be a reasonable fit for large utility-scale or infrastructure-linked projects where its track record in big solar-storage developments is relevant, but buyers should seek direct, project-specific documentation given the limited independent consumer-facing reviews available.

\---LINKS---

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/aiko \| AIKO Solar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/aiko-solar-panels-review/ \| Aiko Solar Panels: An Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://gienergy.com.au/are-aiko-panels-any-good/ \| Are Aiko Panels Any Good? Aiko Solar Panel Review \| video

\- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zonergy \| Zonergy - Bahawalpur Solar Park and company profile \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-zonergy)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-zonergy)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-zonergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-zonergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.