---
title: "AIKO vs Wanze Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Wanze Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-wanze-energy"
---

# AIKO vs Wanze Energy

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 1 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Wanze Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Chengde |
| Founded | 2009 | 2017 |
| Employees |  | 30-50 |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [https://www.wanzenyint.com/](https://www.wanzenyint.com/) |

Chengde Wanze Energy Technology Co., Ltd. is a small Chinese manufacturer of solar PV products headquartered in the Hi-tech District of Chengde, Hebei Province. The company specializes in crystalline silicon solar panels as well as innovative solar PV smart utilities including solar tracking 'flower' systems...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Wanze Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 1 | +143 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 100 W | +705 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 100 W | +481 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Wanze Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 17.00% | +8.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 17.00% | +6.65 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Wanze Energy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.410%/°C | +0.139 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 0 (0%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 10.0 yrs | +19.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Wanze Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Wanze Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | AIKO | Wanze Energy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 0 |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 1 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Wanze Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DLXN-M10-100W](https://comparepv.com/panel/wanze-energy-dlxn-m10-100w) | 100 | 17.0 | -0.410 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Guangzhou, founded around 2009, that has built a premium global profile around its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) cell architecture - a technology that merges back-contact geometry with amorphous silicon passivation for industry-leading conversion efficiency. As of Q3 2024, AIKO was added to the BloombergNEF Tier 1 Solar Module Maker List, a distinction held by fewer than 2% of solar companies worldwide, and the company reports a production capacity in the range of 20 GW per year. Wanze Energy - full name Chengde Wanze Energy Technology Co., Ltd. - is a smaller Chinese manufacturer founded in 2017 and based in Chengde, Hebei. It does not appear on any BloombergNEF or comparable bankability Tier 1 list reviewed for this comparison, and no independent institutional assessments of the brand were found in the public record. In terms of institutional footprint, AIKO is considerably better established.

AIKO's core product families center on high-efficiency ABC modules aimed at premium residential rooftops and commercial or utility-scale installations where efficiency gains translate directly to space savings or yield improvement. The company has claimed a publicly verified world record in mass-production module efficiency and won the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers' Choice Award - signals that the brand is gaining traction not just as a technology showcase but as a field-deployable product. Wanze Energy's catalog, as listed on the ENF Solar directory, leans toward specialty and niche applications: low-wattage crystalline modules, dual-axis solar trackers marketed under the "Solar Sunflower" brand, solar carports, and integrated outdoor structures. The company holds CE and ISO certifications and claims operations in over 10 countries, but no independent performance benchmarks have surfaced for its standard PV modules.

For a typical buyer seeking bankable, well-reviewed solar panels in 2025 - whether for a residential roof or a mid-scale commercial project - AIKO is the stronger default choice, backed by verified efficiency leadership, Tier 1 bankability, and growing installer adoption. Wanze Energy may suit buyers with specific niche requirements such as dual-axis tracking solutions, but it lacks the third-party validation and institutional recognition that most project financiers and installers require.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar panels review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/12/23/aiko-achieves-34-76-efficiency-for-2-terminal-perovskite-silicon-tandem-solar-cell/ \| AIKO achieves 34.76% efficiency for perovskite-silicon tandem cell \| article

\- https://www.raylyst.eu/en/what-distinguishes-aiko-abc-technology-from-perc-topcon-or-hjt-panels/ \| What distinguishes AIKO ABC technology from PERC, TOPCon or HJT \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/wanze-energy \| Wanze Energy manufacturer profile - ENF Solar \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Wanze Energy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-wanze-energy)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Wanze Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-wanze-energy)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Wanze Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-wanze-energy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-wanze-energy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.