---
title: "AIKO vs Ulica Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Ulica Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ulica-solar"
---

# AIKO vs Ulica Solar

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 76 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Ulica Solar leans bifacial (58% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Jiaxing |
| Founded | 2009 | 2014 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [https://www.ulicasolar.com](https://www.ulicasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Ulica Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 76 | +68 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 715 W | +90 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 564 W | +18 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Ulica Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 23.88% | +1.32 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 22.26% | +1.39 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Ulica Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.303%/°C | +0.032 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 44 (58%) | +34 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 29.3 yrs | +0.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 4 (5.3%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 16 (21.1%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 45 (59.2%) |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 11 (14.5%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 1 (1.3%) |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 22 (28.9%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 20 (26.3%) |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 29 (38.2%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 4 (5.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (95%)


| Technology | AIKO | Ulica Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 4 (5.3%) |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 0 |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 72 (94.7%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Ulica Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [UL-715M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-715m-132dgn) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [UL-710M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-710m-132dgn) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [UL-705M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-705m-132dgn) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [UL-700M-132DGN](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-700m-132dgn) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [UL-670M-132DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-670m-132dg) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [UL-670M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-670m-132hv) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [UL-665M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132hv) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [UL-665M-132DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-665m-132dg) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [UL-660M-132DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-660m-132dg) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [UL-660M-132HV](https://comparepv.com/panel/ulica-solar-ul-660m-132hv) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer that achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status in Q3 2024 and has since maintained it into 2026. The company has built an estimated 20 GW of annual production capacity as of early 2025, making it one of the fastest-scaling names in the industry. Ulica Solar, by contrast, was founded in August 2005 and is headquartered in Ningbo, China. It has held Tier 1 status for more than fourteen consecutive quarters and operates at roughly 2 GW of annual capacity, positioning it as a mid-scale, long-established manufacturer rather than a high-growth newcomer. On raw institutional footprint - module finance volume, bankable project history, and production scale - AIKO now carries the larger weight.

The two companies target noticeably different technology tiers. AIKO has built its entire identity around proprietary N-type ABC (All Back Contact) cells, which place all electrical contacts on the rear surface to maximize light capture. This enables verified mass-produced module efficiencies reaching 24.8%, the highest reported in commercial production as of late 2025, and supports product lines covering residential rooftops (the Neostar series at 440-470 W), commercial and industrial rooftops (the Infinite and Comet series, with some variants exceeding 500 W in under 2 m2 of area), and utility-scale ground mounts (the Stellar series). Ulica Solar's catalog leans heavily on TOPCon cell technology and offers a broader range of price-accessible modules suited to commercial rooftops and mid-scale ground-mount projects, with top-end efficiency reaching around 23.9% on its best models.

For a buyer who prioritizes peak performance per square meter and is willing to pay a premium - dense urban rooftops, space-constrained C&I sites - AIKO is the stronger choice in 2025. Ulica Solar remains a credible, bankable option for developers and EPCs who need solid warranty backing and Tier 1 credentials at a more competitive price point, particularly on larger commercial or utility projects where cost-per-watt carries more weight than raw efficiency.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/08/06/aiko-offers-500-w-all-back-contact-solar-modules-for-ci-applications/ \| AIKO offers 500 W all-back contact solar modules for C&I applications \| article

\- https://solarbytes.info/aiko-secures-global-bnef-tier1-solar-maker-status-q3-2024/ \| AIKO excels with BNEF Tier 1 solar ranking \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| AIKO Solar panels review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/ulica-review.html \| Ulica Solar panels review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/ningbo-ulica-solar-science-and-technology \| Ulica Solar manufacturer review - SolarReviews \| review

Sources:

\- \[AIKO offers 500 W all-back contact solar modules for C&I - pv magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/08/06/aiko-offers-500-w-all-back-contact-solar-modules-for-ci-applications/)

\- \[AIKO excels with BNEF Tier 1 solar ranking\](https://solarbytes.info/aiko-secures-global-bnef-tier1-solar-maker-status-q3-2024/)

\- \[AIKO Solar panels review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html)

\- \[Ulica Solar panels review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/ulica-review.html)

\- \[Ulica Solar manufacturer review - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/ningbo-ulica-solar-science-and-technology)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Ulica Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ulica-solar)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Ulica Solar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-ulica-solar)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Ulica Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-ulica-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ulica-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.