---
title: "AIKO vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar"
---

# AIKO vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 144 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2009 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 340 | +196 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 760 W | +45 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 520 W | +61 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 24.80% | +0.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 21.71% | +1.94 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.031 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 145 (43%) | +18 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | AIKO | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a Chinese solar panel manufacturer headquartered in Guangdong province that has built its reputation on proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) N-type cell technology, which removes front-side electrodes to deliver module efficiencies reaching 25% in its Neostar flagship series. The company achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024 - a sign of growing institutional recognition - and has announced plans for BC module shipments exceeding 20 GW in 2025. AIKO has established a European presence through its Solarlab Aiko Europe research center in Freiburg, Germany and a logistics hub in the Netherlands. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, China, is one of the largest solar manufacturers in the world, having shipped 65.21 GW of panels in 2023 alone and accumulating over 205 GW in total global shipments. Trina holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and has been a PVEL Top Performer for 11 consecutive years, a combination that makes it one of the most bankable names in the photovoltaic industry. By virtually every measure of institutional footprint and supply-chain scale, Trina Solar is the more established of the two brands.

AIKO's product lineup centers on its Neostar ABC modules, which target space-constrained residential rooftop installations and commercial C&I projects where maximizing power density is the primary objective. The full-black aesthetic, Class A fire rating, and a 30-year performance warranty with a low annual degradation rate make AIKO panels attractive in premium residential and commercial segments. Trina Solar covers a broader range of use cases - from the Vertex S+ residential modules built on i-TOPCon cells to large-format Vertex modules designed for utility-scale ground-mount projects. Trina's i-TOPCon technology delivers module efficiencies in the 22 to 23.8 percent range, and the brand's competitive pricing - broadly in line with mid-tier market averages - makes it suitable for both high-volume installers and individual homeowners seeking a proven, cost-effective solution.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision hinges on priorities. AIKO's ABC technology delivers a meaningful efficiency advantage and strong shade-tolerance characteristics, making it the better fit for premium, space-constrained installations where maximizing yield per square meter justifies a higher per-panel cost. Trina Solar's broader portfolio, longer operational track record, massive global supply chain, and well-documented bankability make it the lower-risk default for large-scale utility projects and budget-sensitive buyers. The two brands are not interchangeable at the high-efficiency premium end, but for standard residential and commercial-scale installations with adequate roof space, either manufacturer will deliver reliable long-term performance.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-trina-solar)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.