--- title: "AIKO vs Solaria - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AIKO vs Solaria solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solaria" --- # AIKO vs Solaria AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 27 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. ## The two companies | Attribute | AIKO | Solaria | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | Spain | | Headquarters | Shanghai | Madrid | | Founded | 2009 | 2002 | | Employees | | 235 | | Annual capacity | | 1.658 GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | | | Listed | SZSE: 600732 | BME (Madrid Stock Exchange): SLR | | Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [https://www.solaria.com](https://www.solaria.com) | Solaria is a leading European company focused on developing and generating solar photovoltaic energy. The company aims to contribute to decarbonization by creating a global energy model based on clean energy. Solaria specializes in the implementation and development of solar photovoltaic technology, from manufacturing... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AIKO | Solaria | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 144 | 27 | +117 | | Max Power | 805 W | 680 W | +125 W | | Avg Power | 581 W | 436 W | +146 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AIKO | Solaria | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 21.92% | +3.28 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 19.96% | +3.69 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AIKO | Solaria | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.360%/°C | +0.089 | | Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 5 (19%) | +6 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 26.5 yrs | +3.0 yr | ## Efficiency distribution AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AIKO | Solaria | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 13 (48.1%) | | 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 9 (33.3%) | | 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 5 (18.5%) | | 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 0 | | 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 0 | ## Power distribution AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup) | Power band | AIKO | Solaria | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 14 (51.9%) | | 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 8 (29.6%) | | 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 5 (18.5%) | | 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (19%) | Technology | AIKO | Solaria | | --- | --- | --- | | Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 | | N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 | | PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 4 (14.8%) | | Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 | | Unknown | 0 | 18 (66.7%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 5 (18.5%) | ## Top panels, AIKO | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Solaria | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SPV680-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-spv680-tg12-132bd) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SPV675-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-spv675-tg12-132bd) | 675 | 21.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SPV670-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-spv670-tg12-132bd) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SPV665-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-spv665-tg12-132bd) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SPV660-TG12-132BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-spv660-tg12-132bd) | 660 | 21.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [PowerXT 430R-PL](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-powerxt-430r-pl) | 430 | 20.4 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [Solaria PowerXT-430C-PD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-solaria-powerxt-430c-pd) | 430 | 19.8 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [PowerXT 420R-PL](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-powerxt-420r-pl) | 420 | 19.9 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [Solaria PowerXT-420C-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-solaria-powerxt-420c-bd) | 420 | 19.4 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [Solaria PowerXT-420C-PD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solaria-solaria-powerxt-420c-pd) | 420 | 19.4 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Solaria Corporation is a US-based manufacturer headquartered in Fremont, California, with over two decades of experience designing premium residential solar modules. It operates production facilities in both California and Asia, and is primarily focused on the North American market. Its BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status was not confirmed in publicly available sources at the time of writing, which suggests Solaria operates at a boutique scale relative to the industry's largest players. AIKO (also styled Aiko Solar) was founded in 2009 in Guangzhou, China, initially as a cell manufacturer before expanding into full-module production around 2022-2023. It achieved official BloombergNEF Tier 1 status as of Q3 2024 and reports a production capacity of roughly 20 GW, placing it firmly among the upper tier of Chinese manufacturers by volume. On institutional footprint and verified bankability, AIKO holds the clear advantage. The two brands are differentiated as much by technology as by target market. Solaria built its identity around shingled cell design, in which cells are cut and layered to increase power density, reduce shade losses, and deliver a seamless all-black aesthetic - making its PowerXT series a recurring recommendation for premium residential rooftops where curb appeal and shading constraints matter. Efficiency ratings for Solaria modules are generally cited in the 19-21% range. AIKO, by contrast, has staked its product line on All-Back-Contact (ABC) cell technology, which relocates all electrical contacts to the rear of the cell to eliminate front-side shading losses at the cell level. In mid-2025 AIKO announced a mass-production module efficiency record of 24.4%, among the highest commercially available. Its Neostar series is used across premium residential, commercial rooftop, and emerging utility-scale applications, and the brand has won significant market traction in the Australian market, taking first place in the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers' Choice Awards. For most buyers in 2025, AIKO is the stronger default - it combines confirmed Tier 1 bankability, industry-leading efficiency, a competitive 30-year performance warranty, and substantial global supply capacity. Solaria is a defensible choice for North American homeowners who specifically value the shingled-panel aesthetic, domestic design provenance, and an established US installer network, but it comes at a higher cost per watt and with less publicly verified institutional backing. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/solaria-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Solaria Solar Panels - Complete Review \| EnergySage \| review \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/reviewing-solaria-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Solaria Solar Panels \| SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| AIKO Solar Panels Review \| SolarQuotes Australia \| review \- https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/ \| AIKO Achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 Status \| article \- https://solarbytes.info/aiko-secures-global-bnef-tier1-solar-maker-status-q3-2024/ \| AIKO secures BNEF Tier 1 solar maker status Q3 2024 \| article Sources: \- \[Solaria Solar Panels - Complete Review \| EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/solaria-solar-panels-complete-review/) \- \[Complete Review of Solaria Solar Panels \| SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/reviewing-solaria-solar-panels) \- \[AIKO Solar Panels Review \| SolarQuotes Australia\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html) \- \[AIKO Achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 Status\](https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/) \- \[AIKO secures BNEF Tier 1 solar maker status Q3 2024\](https://solarbytes.info/aiko-secures-global-bnef-tier1-solar-maker-status-q3-2024/) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Solaria](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-solaria) - [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet) - [AKCOME vs Solaria](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-solaria) - [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs Solaria](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-solaria) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solaria Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.