--- title: "AIKO vs Solarfam - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AIKO vs Solarfam solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solarfam" --- # AIKO vs Solarfam AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 0 models). AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AIKO | Solarfam | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | Netherlands | | Headquarters | Shanghai | Nieuwegein | | Founded | 2009 | | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | yes | | | Listed | SZSE: 600732 | | | Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [https://www.solarfam.nl](https://www.solarfam.nl) | Solarfam is a Dutch solar energy brand operating under the parent company Solmax New Energy B.V. The company distributes and sells solar panels, inverters, batteries, controllers, and water pump systems, targeting both residential and agricultural markets. It positions itself as a sales and integration brand sourcing... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AIKO | Solarfam | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 144 | 0 | +144 | | Max Power | 805 W | 0 W | +805 W | | Avg Power | 581 W | 0 W | +581 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AIKO | Solarfam | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 25.20% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AIKO | Solarfam | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 0 (0%) | +24 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AIKO | Solarfam | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 0 | | 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 0 | ## Power distribution AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup) | Power band | AIKO | Solarfam | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%) | Technology | AIKO | Solarfam | | --- | --- | --- | | Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 | | N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 | | PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 0 | | Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 | ## Top panels, AIKO | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Solarfam is a Netherlands-based brand operating under Solmax New Energy B.V., headquartered in Nieuwegein. It functions primarily as a wholesaler and distributor rather than a large-scale cell-and-module manufacturer, catering to DIY installers, caravan and marine users, and customers in areas without grid access. No Tier 1 or BloombergNEF bankability listing has been identified for Solarfam, and its annual production footprint is not publicly reported at the gigawatt scale. AIKO, by contrast, is a vertically integrated Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Yiwu, with roots tracing back to Shanghai Aiko Solar Energy Co., Ltd., founded in 1996. AIKO achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in 2024 and, according to published capacity trackers, had roughly 20 GW of annual production capacity in early 2025 - a figure that reportedly expanded further through 2026. On institutional footprint, AIKO is unambiguously the larger, more bankable entity. The two brands serve almost entirely different market segments. Solarfam's catalog is oriented toward compact, off-grid applications - micro-grid kits for boats and recreational vehicles, solar water pumps, and small residential backup systems - pairing its panels with its own inverters, batteries, and charge controllers. AIKO, on the other hand, targets on-grid residential rooftops and commercial arrays where efficiency and aesthetics matter. Its proprietary N-type ABC (All Back Contact) cell technology, developed in-house and commercialized from 2021, has set successive world records for mass-produced module efficiency and earned AIKO the top spot in the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers Choice Awards in Australia. AIKO backs its panels with a 15-year product warranty and a 30-year performance warranty. For a buyer evaluating grid-tied residential or light commercial solar in 2025, AIKO is the clear default choice - it offers verified high efficiency, confirmed bankability, and a meaningful warranty commitment. Solarfam fills a different niche: portable, off-grid, and DIY systems where simplicity and bundled components outweigh the need for BloombergNEF-grade bankability. The two brands are not interchangeable; their target use cases barely overlap. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| AIKO Solar panel review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review \- https://sunsparkenergy.com.au/blog/solar-panels-1/aiko-solar-panels-review-2025-14 \| AIKO Solar Panels Review 2025 - Sun Spark Energy \| review \- https://www.pscenergy.com.au/blog/aiko-solar-panels-pros-and-cons/ \| AIKO Solar Panels Pros and Cons - PSC Energy \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/solarfam \| Solarfam company profile - ENF Solar industry directory \| article \- https://www.vicoexport.com/en/65510/tier-1-list-of-solar-panel-manufacturers-q1-2026/ \| Tier 1 Solar Panel Manufacturers List Q1 2026 - Vico Export \| article Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Solarfam](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-solarfam) - [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet) - [AKCOME vs Solarfam](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-solarfam) - [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs Solarfam](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-solarfam) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solarfam Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.