---
title: "AIKO vs Shinson Technology - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Shinson Technology solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-shinson-technology"
---

# AIKO vs Shinson Technology

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 105 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Shinson Technology leans bifacial (62% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Shinson Technology |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2009 | 2010 |
| Employees |  | 500+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 10+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [http://shinsontech.com](http://shinsontech.com) |

Shinson Technology is a leading professional supplier in the renewable energy industry, specializing in the production and distribution of high-quality PV modules, completed PV kits, and energy storage solutions. With a commitment to sustainable energy solutions, they strive to provide innovative and reliable products...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Shinson Technology | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 105 | +39 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 720 W | +85 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 477 W | +104 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Shinson Technology | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 23.23% | +1.97 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 20.54% | +3.11 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Shinson Technology | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.314%/°C | +0.044 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 65 (62%) | +38 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 27.7 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Shinson Technology |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 24 (22.9%) |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 17 (16.2%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 31 (29.5%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 28 (26.7%) |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 5 (4.8%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Shinson Technology |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 25 (23.8%) |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 45 (42.9%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 16 (15.2%) |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 13 (12.4%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 6 (5.7%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (40%)


| Technology | AIKO | Shinson Technology |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 35 (33.3%) |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 5 (4.8%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 42 (40.0%) |
| HJT | 0 | 15 (14.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 4 (3.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 4 (3.8%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Shinson Technology


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [S720M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s720m66ht4bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [S715M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s715m66ht4bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [S710M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s710m66ht4bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [S705M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s705m66ht4bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [S700M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s700m66nt4bf) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [S700M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [S695M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s695m66nt4bf) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [S690M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s690m66nt4bf) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [S685M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s685m66nt4bf) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [S680M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s680m66nt4bf) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a Chinese manufacturer that rose to prominence in the early 2020s with its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) N-type cell technology, which relocates all electrical contacts to the rear of the cell to eliminate front-side shading. The company secured BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status in 2024 and, according to industry sources, had ABC production capacity in the range of 15-20 GW heading into 2025, with further expansion underway at its Yiwu and Chuzhou bases. Shinson Technology, headquartered in Changzhou, China, and founded in 2010, is a smaller, generalist solar manufacturer offering panels, storage, and balance-of-system kits for residential, commercial, and agricultural applications. No Tier 1 or BloombergNEF bankability designation for Shinson appeared in available sources, and the company's annual production scale is not publicly documented at a GW level. On institutional footprint, AIKO is the clear leader of the two.

On the product side, AIKO's focus is firmly on high-efficiency ABC modules aimed at premium residential rooftops and space-constrained commercial installations where squeezing the most output per square metre justifies a higher price point. Commercial module efficiencies have been confirmed above 24%, and AIKO panels topped the TaiyangNews global module efficiency rankings from March 2023 onward while also placing first in the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers' Choice Awards in Australia. Shinson's catalog, by contrast, spans a broader but shallower range - standard crystalline modules, BIPV blade panels, shingled designs, and bundled solar kits - positioning the brand as a budget-to-mid-market generalist rather than a technology leader.

For most buyers in 2025, AIKO is the stronger default where efficiency and bankability matter, such as residential retrofits, commercial rooftops with limited space, and projects requiring financeable equipment. Shinson may suit buyers seeking a lower entry price for simple off-grid or agricultural setups, but the absence of verifiable Tier 1 status means financing and long-term warranty security carry more risk than with AIKO.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-capacity-upgrades-abc-cell-technology/ \| Aiko steps up ABC transition with 11GW capacity upgrade - PV Tech \| article

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/aiko-solar-panels-review/ \| Aiko Solar Panels - Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar panel review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://www.raylyst.eu/en/what-distinguishes-aiko-abc-technology-from-perc-topcon-or-hjt-panels/ \| What makes AIKO ABC technology stand out - Raylyst Solar \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/shinson-technology \| Shinson Technology Co., Ltd. profile - ENF Solar directory \| article

Sources:

\- \[Aiko steps up ABC transition with 11GW capacity upgrade - PV Tech\](https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-capacity-upgrades-abc-cell-technology/)

\- \[Aiko Solar Panels: An Independent Review by Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/aiko-solar-panels-review/)

\- \[Aiko Solar panel review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html)

\- \[What makes AIKO ABC technology stand out - Raylyst Solar\](https://www.raylyst.eu/en/what-distinguishes-aiko-abc-technology-from-perc-topcon-or-hjt-panels/)

\- \[Shinson Technology Co., Ltd. - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/shinson-technology)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Shinson Technology](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-shinson-technology)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Shinson Technology](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-shinson-technology)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Shinson Technology](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-shinson-technology)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-shinson-technology

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.