---
title: "AIKO vs Runergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Runergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy"
---

# AIKO vs Runergy

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 124 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province |
| Founded | 2009 | 2013 |
| Employees |  | 15,000 |
| Annual capacity |  | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) |

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 124 | +20 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 740 W | +65 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 579 W | +2 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 24.10% | +1.10 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 22.42% | +1.23 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.298%/°C | +0.028 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 95 (77%) | +52 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 9 (7.3%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 26 (21.0%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 48 (38.7%) |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 41 (33.1%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 36 (29.0%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 28 (22.6%) |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 35 (28.2%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 25 (20.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (60%)


| Technology | AIKO | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 74 (59.7%) |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 32 (25.8%) |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 18 (14.5%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a China-headquartered manufacturer founded in 2009 as a subsidiary of Shanghai Aiko Solar Energy, and it achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status starting in 2024, reaching an annual production capacity reported around 20 GW in early 2025 and expanding toward roughly 35 GW by 2026. Runergy, also headquartered in China (Jiangsu), has held BNEF Tier 1 status for six consecutive quarters through 2024 into 2025 and reported planned capacity around 63 GW for cells and 23 GW for modules by the end of 2023, alongside newer manufacturing operations in Thailand, Vietnam and a facility in Huntsville, Alabama. Both brands are considered bankable Tier 1 suppliers, but Runergy currently shows a larger and more geographically diversified manufacturing footprint, giving it a somewhat stronger institutional and supply-chain presence.

AIKO built its identity around proprietary ABC (all back contact) cell technology, launched commercially in 2022, which hides all electrical contacts on the rear of the cell for a fully black, connector-free front surface; this has made AIKO panels particularly popular for premium residential rooftops where aesthetics matter, while the company has also pushed module efficiency records and industry design awards. Runergy's product line centers on TOPCon n-type cells, with generations reaching mass-production efficiencies above 26%, and it manufactures a wide power range from roughly 380W residential modules up to 740W high-power modules aimed at commercial and utility-scale ground-mount projects, plus bifacial double-glass variants noted for strong independent test scores including a top ranking in a pv magazine module performance test.

For a typical 2025-2026 buyer, the choice largely comes down to application and priorities: AIKO is the stronger pick when rooftop appearance and record efficiency are the deciding factors, particularly for residential installations, while Runergy's broader capacity, wider power range and diversified manufacturing base make it a natural fit for larger commercial or utility-scale projects where bankability and volume matter most. Both are legitimate Tier 1 suppliers, so for many buyers the two brands are reasonably interchangeable and the decision may come down to local distributor support and pricing rather than fundamental technology gaps.

\---LINKS---

\- https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/ \| AIKO achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 status \| article

\- https://www.runergy.com/q4-update-runergy-secures-year-round-bloombergnef-tier-1-status-as-a-pv-module-manufacturer-in-2024/ \| Runergy secures year-round BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in 2024 \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/intersolar-europe-2026-runergy-launches-topcon-module-conversion-efficiency-26-9/ \| Runergy launches 26.9% efficient TOPCon module \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar Panels Review \| review

\- https://www.runergy.com/runergys-n-type-modules-achieve-top-ranking-in-pv-magazines-latest-performance-test/ \| Runergy N-Type modules top pv magazine performance test \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-runergy)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-runergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.