---
title: "AIKO vs Renew Photovoltaics - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Renew Photovoltaics solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-renew-photovoltaics"
---

# AIKO vs Renew Photovoltaics

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 14 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Renew Photovoltaics leans bifacial (93% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Renew Photovoltaics |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | India |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Gurugram |
| Founded | 2009 | 2011 |
| Employees |  | 4,336 |
| Annual capacity |  | 6+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 | NASDAQ: RNW, RNWWW |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [https://www.renew.com/](https://www.renew.com/) |

ReNew is a leading decarbonization company and one of the largest renewable energy independent power producers in India. Founded in 2011 by Sumant Sinha, the company delivers end-to-end decarbonization solutions, including wind, solar, hydropower, green hydrogen, energy storage, carbon credits and energy services...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Renew Photovoltaics | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 14 | +130 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 640 W | +165 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 569 W | +13 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Renew Photovoltaics | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 23.69% | +1.51 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 21.80% | +1.86 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Renew Photovoltaics | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.311%/°C | +0.041 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 13 (93%) | +69 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 29.6 yrs | +0.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Renew Photovoltaics |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 3 (21.4%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 5 (35.7%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 5 (35.7%) |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 1 (7.1%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Renew Photovoltaics |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 12 (85.7%) |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 2 (14.3%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (57%)


| Technology | AIKO | Renew Photovoltaics |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 8 (57.1%) |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 6 (42.9%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Renew Photovoltaics


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RPS3MH66BDXXX](https://comparepv.com/panel/renew-photovoltaics-rps3mh66bdxxx) | 640 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RPS1MH60MBXXX](https://comparepv.com/panel/renew-photovoltaics-rps1mh60mbxxx) | 610 | 21.5 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RPS2MH72BD590](https://comparepv.com/panel/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd590) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RPS2MH72BD585](https://comparepv.com/panel/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd585) | 585 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RPS2MH72BD580](https://comparepv.com/panel/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RPS2MH72BD575](https://comparepv.com/panel/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd575) | 575 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RPS2MH72BD570](https://comparepv.com/panel/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd570) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RPS2MH72BD560](https://comparepv.com/panel/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd560) | 560 | 21.7 | -0.320 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RPS2MH72BD555](https://comparepv.com/panel/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd555) | 555 | 21.5 | -0.320 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RPS2MH72BD550](https://comparepv.com/panel/renew-photovoltaics-rps2mh72bd550) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.320 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Renew Photovoltaics is the solar manufacturing arm of ReNew Energy Global, a NASDAQ-listed Indian independent power producer headquartered in Gurgaon. Its manufacturing division was established in 2021 and operates a 6.4 GW module facility in Jaipur, Rajasthan, alongside a 2.5 GW cell plant, with a further 4 GW TOPCon cell facility under construction in Dholera, Gujarat, backed by a $100 million investment from British International Investment confirmed in May 2025. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 classification for Renew Photovoltaics as a third-party module supplier was found in available sources. AIKO Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer that achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status in Q3 2024 and carries a reported production capacity in the range of 20 GW, giving it a considerably larger institutional footprint on global financing markets.

The two companies occupy quite different product niches. Renew Photovoltaics primarily serves ReNew's own large-scale utility projects in India, with surplus modules sold domestically to customers such as NTPC - making it effectively an integrated captive manufacturer rather than a broad-market brand. AIKO, by contrast, has built its commercial identity around its proprietary N-type all-back-contact (ABC) cell architecture. Its Neostar residential series has posted independently verified mass-production module efficiencies above 24%, with pv-magazine and PV Tech reporting a 24.8% commercial benchmark in late 2025 and a 25% milestone in mass production shortly after. AIKO supports these panels with a 30-year performance warranty and took first place in the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers' Choice Awards in Australia, reflecting genuine installer-level adoption across residential and light commercial rooftops.

For buyers outside India - particularly those seeking premium residential or commercial rooftop panels with a verifiable efficiency edge and bankable third-party credentials - AIKO is the stronger default choice in 2025. Renew Photovoltaics is most relevant for domestic Indian procurement, especially utility-scale projects that benefit from India's Approved List of Models and Manufacturers (ALMM) compliance and local content requirements. The two brands are not meaningfully interchangeable given their geographic focus and target customer base.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/12/19/aiko-achieves-24-8-efficiency-in-commercial-solar-module-production/ \| AIKO achieves 24.8% efficiency in commercial solar module production \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/industry-updates/aiko-achieves-25-module-efficiency-in-mass-production/ \| AIKO achieves 25% module efficiency in mass production - PV Tech \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/07/aiko-launches-new-rooftop-solar-panels-with-24-3-efficiency/ \| Aiko launches new rooftop solar panels with 24.3% efficiency \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar panels review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine-india.com/2025/05/06/renew-secures-100-million-from-bii-to-scale-solar-manufacturing-operations/ \| ReNew secures $100 million from BII to scale solar manufacturing \| article

Sources:

\- \[AIKO achieves 24.8% efficiency in commercial solar module production\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/12/19/aiko-achieves-24-8-efficiency-in-commercial-solar-module-production/)

\- \[AIKO achieves 25% module efficiency in mass production - PV Tech\](https://www.pv-tech.org/industry-updates/aiko-achieves-25-module-efficiency-in-mass-production/)

\- \[Aiko launches new rooftop solar panels with 24.3% efficiency\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/07/aiko-launches-new-rooftop-solar-panels-with-24-3-efficiency/)

\- \[Aiko Solar panels review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html)

\- \[ReNew secures $100 million from BII to scale solar manufacturing\](https://www.pv-magazine-india.com/2025/05/06/renew-secures-100-million-from-bii-to-scale-solar-manufacturing-operations/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Renew Photovoltaics](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-renew-photovoltaics)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Renew Photovoltaics](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-renew-photovoltaics)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Renew Photovoltaics](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-renew-photovoltaics)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-renew-photovoltaics

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.