--- title: "AIKO vs QN-SOLAR - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AIKO vs QN-SOLAR solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-qn-solar" --- # AIKO vs QN-SOLAR AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 0 models). AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AIKO | QN-SOLAR | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Shanghai | Shanghai | | Founded | 2009 | 2014 | | Employees | | 5000-10000 | | Annual capacity | | 30-40 GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | no | | Listed | SZSE: 600732 | | | Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [https://www.qn-solarpv.com](https://www.qn-solarpv.com) | QN-SOLAR (Qn-SOLAR PV Limited) is a China-based integrated photovoltaic manufacturer with six production bases across China, specializing in N-TOPCon solar cells and modules. The company officially launched its global business in 2022 and has expanded into upstream and downstream PV production, reaching a combined... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AIKO | QN-SOLAR | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 144 | 0 | +144 | | Max Power | 805 W | 0 W | +805 W | | Avg Power | 581 W | 0 W | +581 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AIKO | QN-SOLAR | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 25.20% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AIKO | QN-SOLAR | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 0 (0%) | +24 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AIKO | QN-SOLAR | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 0 | | 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 0 | ## Power distribution AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup) | Power band | AIKO | QN-SOLAR | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%) | Technology | AIKO | QN-SOLAR | | --- | --- | --- | | Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 | | N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 | | PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 0 | | Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 | ## Top panels, AIKO | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary QN-SOLAR is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, founded in 2021 under the ZhongQing PV name, having initially operated as a project developer and EPC contractor before building out dedicated cell and module production lines. It claims a cell capacity of around 20 GW and module output of approximately 25 GW annually as of 2024, making it a mid-to-large-scale producer by volume. No confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation for QN-SOLAR has surfaced in available industry sources as of early 2026. AIKO - formally Aiko Solar - is also China-based, headquartered in Zhongshan, Guangdong, and achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024 with a reported production capacity of approximately 20 GW as of Q1 2025. With its Tier 1 recognition and growing presence in institutionally financed projects, AIKO carries the stronger bankability standing of the two. QN-SOLAR's catalog centers on N-TOPCon modules aimed at commercial and utility-scale buyers seeking a cost-effective next-generation alternative to PERC. The brand is generally positioned as a value-oriented supplier for price-sensitive project developers and EPC contractors. AIKO has distinguished itself through its proprietary ABC (All-Back-Contact) N-type cell technology, which routes all electrical contacts to the rear of the cell to maximize active surface area. Its Neostar series is independently recognized as among the most efficient residential panels commercially available, with top models rated above 24% efficiency and a temperature coefficient of around -0.26%/degC, compared to the industry norm of roughly -0.40%/degC. AIKO targets premium residential rooftops and commercial installations where high energy yield per square meter justifies a higher price point. For most buyers in 2025-2026, AIKO is the sounder default: its Tier 1 bankability, verified efficiency leadership, and strong installer reception - including a first-place finish in the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers' Choice Awards - reduce project risk meaningfully. QN-SOLAR remains competitive for procurement teams focused on TOPCon module pricing, but its limited institutional track record makes it a harder sell for financed utility-scale deals. Both brands carry the usual caveats of relatively recent entrants in a market dominated by longer-established names. \---LINKS--- \- https://comparepv.com/reviews/qn-solar \| QN-SOLAR Panels Review 2026 - Pros, Cons and Specs \| review \- https://mcelectrical.com.au/debunking-the-aiko-solar-panel-hype-a-real-world-performance-test/ \| Debunking the AIKO Solar Panel Hype - A Real-World Performance Test \| review \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar Panel Review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/12/05/chinese-pv-industry-brief-aiko-skyworth-pv-plan-5-gw-back-contact-solar-module-factory-in-guangxi/ \| AIKO and Skyworth PV plan 5 GW back-contact module factory in Guangxi \| article \- https://taiyangnews.info/markets/china-solar-pv-news-snippets-march-12-2025 \| AIKO Wins 1 GW Utility-Scale BC Module Bid - TaiyangNews \| article Sources: \- \[QN-SOLAR Panels Review 2026 \| ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/qn-solar) \- \[Debunking the AIKO Solar Panel Hype - MC Electrical\](https://mcelectrical.com.au/debunking-the-aiko-solar-panel-hype-a-real-world-performance-test/) \- \[Aiko Solar Panel Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html) \- \[AIKO and Skyworth PV plan 5 GW factory - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/12/05/chinese-pv-industry-brief-aiko-skyworth-pv-plan-5-gw-back-contact-solar-module-factory-in-guangxi/) \- \[AIKO Wins 1 GW Utility-Scale BC Module Bid - TaiyangNews\](https://taiyangnews.info/markets/china-solar-pv-news-snippets-march-12-2025) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs QN-SOLAR](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-qn-solar) - [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet) - [AKCOME vs QN-SOLAR](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-qn-solar) - [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs QN-SOLAR](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-qn-solar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-qn-solar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.