---
title: "AIKO vs Pylontech - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Pylontech solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-pylontech"
---

# AIKO vs Pylontech

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 0 models). AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Pylontech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2009 | 2009 |
| Employees |  | 2,114 |
| Annual capacity |  | 7-8.5 (in 2022) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 | SSE (Shanghai Stock Exchange): 688063 |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [https://www.pylontech.com.cn](https://www.pylontech.com.cn) |

Pylontech is a leading battery energy storage system (BESS) provider, specializing in lithium iron phosphate technology. They offer solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications, integrating expertise in electrochemistry, power electronics, and system integration. The company is dedicated to...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Pylontech | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 0 | +144 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 0 W | +805 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 0 W | +581 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Pylontech | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Pylontech | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 0 (0%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Pylontech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Pylontech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | AIKO | Pylontech |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 0 |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Pylontech is a Chinese energy storage manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, founded in 2009 and listed on China's STAR Market in 2020. It is a dedicated battery energy storage system (BESS) company and does not manufacture solar panels; its role in the solar value chain is supplying the storage half of a PV-plus-storage installation. As of Q2 2026, Pylontech holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status as an energy storage manufacturer - a recognition it earned on criteria including large-scale project execution, financial credibility, and product reliability - and reports over 13 GWh of annual production capacity. AIKO, also a Chinese company, is a true solar module manufacturer; it achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status on the solar panel side and has grown to roughly 20 GW of annual module capacity, placing it among the mid-to-upper tier of Chinese panel producers by volume. In terms of institutional footprint, Pylontech's STAR Market listing and decade-plus track record give it slightly broader financial visibility, though AIKO is closing that gap quickly.

Because the two companies operate in different product segments, a direct comparison is most useful at the system level. Pylontech's product families - the US series and Force H1 line of lithium iron phosphate (LFP) rack batteries - are aimed at residential, commercial, and utility-scale storage, and are specifically designed to pair with a wide range of third-party inverters from brands such as SMA, Victron, and Growatt. AIKO's modules, built on its proprietary All Back Contact (ABC) cell technology, target buyers who prioritize peak efficiency and roof-space constraints; independent tests and the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers' Choice Award reflect strong real-world performance, and AIKO has claimed world-record mass-produced module efficiency above 24%. Its 30-year performance warranty is notably longer than the 25-year standard common among peers.

For a buyer planning a complete solar-plus-storage system, these brands are not competitors but potential partners - AIKO on the panels, Pylontech on the battery. If forced to evaluate each on its own segment, AIKO stands out as a high-efficiency panel choice for space-constrained residential or premium commercial rooftops, while Pylontech is a well-established, bankable default for LFP storage where inverter compatibility and proven large-scale deployments matter. Neither brand should be dismissed; both carry Tier 1 institutional recognition in their respective categories.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pylontech-recognized-as-bloombergnef-tier-1-energy-storage-manufacturer-302765382.html \| Pylontech recognized as BloombergNEF Tier 1 Energy Storage Manufacturer \| article

\- https://www.cleanenergyreviews.info/blog/pylontech-battery-review \| Pylontech Battery Review - Clean Energy Reviews \| review

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-capacity-upgrades-abc-cell-technology/ \| Aiko steps up ABC transition with 11GW capacity upgrade - PV Tech \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar panels review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/ \| AIKO achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 status - AIKO official \| article

Sources:

\- \[Pylontech recognized as BloombergNEF Tier 1 Energy Storage Manufacturer\](https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pylontech-recognized-as-bloombergnef-tier-1-energy-storage-manufacturer-302765382.html)

\- \[Pylontech Battery Review - Clean Energy Reviews\](https://www.cleanenergyreviews.info/blog/pylontech-battery-review)

\- \[Aiko steps up ABC transition with 11GW capacity upgrade - PV Tech\](https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-capacity-upgrades-abc-cell-technology/)

\- \[Aiko Solar panels review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html)

\- \[AIKO achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 status\](https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Pylontech](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-pylontech)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Pylontech](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-pylontech)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Pylontech](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-pylontech)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-pylontech

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.