---
title: "AIKO vs Mysolar USA - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Mysolar USA solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-mysolar-usa"
---

# AIKO vs Mysolar USA

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 15 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Mysolar USA leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Mysolar USA |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2009 | 2010 |
| Employees |  | 60 |
| Annual capacity |  | 3.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [https://www.mamibot.com/](https://www.mamibot.com/) |

Mysolar is a sub-brand of Mamibot, specializing in designing and manufacturing high-efficiency solar panels using state-of-the-art technology. The company aims to become a Tier 1 solar panel manufacturer, offering a wide range of modules for residential and commercial projects. Mysolar is committed to rewriting the...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Mysolar USA | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 15 | +129 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 720 W | +85 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 610 W | +29 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Mysolar USA | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 23.17% | +2.03 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 22.42% | +1.23 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Mysolar USA | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.283%/°C | +0.013 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 15 (100%) | +76 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Mysolar USA |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 3 (20.0%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 10 (66.7%) |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 2 (13.3%) |


## Power distribution

Mysolar USA offers more 600W+ panels (67% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Mysolar USA |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 5 (33.3%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 4 (26.7%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 6 (40.0%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (67%)


| Technology | AIKO | Mysolar USA |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 0 |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 10 (66.7%) |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (33.3%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Mysolar USA


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MS720N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms720n-hjtgb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MS715N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms715n-hjtgb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MS710N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms710n-hjtgb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MS705N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms705n-hjtgb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MS700N-DHBG](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms700n-dhbg) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [MS700N-HJTGB](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms700n-hjtgb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MS695N-DHBG](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms695n-dhbg) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MS690N-DHBG](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms690n-dhbg) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [MS685N-DHBG](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms685n-dhbg) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MS680N-DHBG](https://comparepv.com/panel/mysolar-usa-ms680n-dhbg) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Mysolar USA is a solar panel brand operated under Mamibot USA, a company with US incorporation and manufacturing roots in China. It cites more than 17 years of solar PV engineering experience, though independent confirmation of this lineage is limited. As of early 2026, Mysolar USA has not achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status, and company materials indicate that mass production for larger orders was only beginning to ramp toward the 25 MW range in early 2026 - a very modest scale by industry standards. AIKO Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer that secured BloombergNEF Tier 1 recognition in Q3 2024, placing it among the roughly 2% of global solar companies to earn that designation. AIKO reports annual production capacity exceeding 5 GW and over 190 GW in cumulative cell and module shipments. On institutional footprint, AIKO holds a decisive advantage.

Mysolar USA offers a broad catalog spanning PERC, shingled PERC, TOPCon, and HJT modules ranging from roughly 410 W to 740 W, targeting residential rooftops and smaller commercial installations. AIKO has built its reputation around N-type All-Back-Contact (ABC) cell technology, which places all contacts on the rear of the cell to maximize the light-absorbing surface. Its Neostar series has set efficiency benchmarks, with the company claiming a world-record 24.4% module efficiency for commercially available panels as of 2025. AIKO also offers a 30-year performance warranty with a low 0.35% annual degradation rate from year two onward - more generous terms than most peers.

For a typical buyer in 2025, AIKO is the more defensible choice. Its Tier 1 bankability, GW-scale manufacturing, and leading ABC efficiency make it suitable for residential, commercial, and financed projects alike. Mysolar USA may appeal to buyers seeking a smaller, more flexible vendor or a competitive entry point into HJT technology, but its limited institutional track record and modest production scale introduce meaningful supply and warranty-support risk that AIKO does not share.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| AIKO Solar panel review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://www.fmb.org.uk/homepicks/solar-panels/aiko-solar-panel-review/ \| AIKO Neostar 3P54 470W solar panels review - FMB \| review

\- https://www.vicoexport.com/en/54918/aiko-obtains-level-1-recognition-from-bloombergnef/ \| AIKO achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 recognition \| article

\- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/mysolar-usa \| Mysolar USA panel profile - EnergyPal \| review

Sources:

\- \[AIKO Solar panel review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html)

\- \[AIKO Neostar 3P54 470W solar panels review - FMB\](https://www.fmb.org.uk/homepicks/solar-panels/aiko-solar-panel-review/)

\- \[AIKO achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 recognition\](https://www.vicoexport.com/en/54918/aiko-obtains-level-1-recognition-from-bloombergnef/)

\- \[Mysolar USA panel profile - EnergyPal\](https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/mysolar-usa)

\- \[MySolar profile - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/supplier/25944/mysolar/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Mysolar USA](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-mysolar-usa)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Mysolar USA](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-mysolar-usa)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Mysolar USA](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-mysolar-usa)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-mysolar-usa

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.