---
title: "AIKO vs Mission Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Mission Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-mission-solar"
---

# AIKO vs Mission Solar

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 24 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Mission Solar leans bifacial (75% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Mission Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | United States |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | San Antonio |
| Founded | 2009 | 2014 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [https://www.missionsolar.com](https://www.missionsolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Mission Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 24 | +120 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 670 W | +135 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 554 W | +28 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Mission Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 23.00% | +2.20 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 22.11% | +1.54 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Mission Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.313%/°C | +0.043 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 18 (75%) | +51 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +0.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Mission Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 2 (8.3%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 7 (29.2%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 13 (54.2%) |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 2 (8.3%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Mission Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 6 (25.0%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 12 (50.0%) |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 6 (25.0%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (38%)


| Technology | AIKO | Mission Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 9 (37.5%) |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 9 (37.5%) |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 6 (25.0%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Mission Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MST12670HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12670hp3g) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MST12665HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12665hp3g) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MST12660HP3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12660hp3g) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MST12R620HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r620hn3g) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MST12R615HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r615hn3g) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [MST12R610HN3G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-mst12r610hn3g) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MSH10-595HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msh10-595hn4g) | 595 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MSI10-590HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msi10-590hn4g) | 590 | 22.9 | -0.298 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [MSH10-590HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msh10-590hn4g) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MSI10-585HN4G](https://comparepv.com/panel/mission-solar-msi10-585hn4g) | 585 | 22.7 | -0.298 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Mission Solar is a U.S.-based module manufacturer headquartered in San Antonio, Texas, and has been assembling panels domestically since around 2014 under the ownership of South Korean conglomerate OCI Holdings. In March 2025, the company announced a $265 million investment to add 2 GW of in-house solar cell production to its Texas campus, with output targeted for early 2026 - a move that would make it one of the few truly vertically integrated American solar manufacturers. As of mid-2025, it carries Tier 1 bankability recognition from third-party assessors backed by domestic certifications such as UL and CEC. AIKO, formally Shanghai Aiko Solar Energy, is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2009 and headquartered across production bases in Guangdong and Zhejiang. The company has reported annual cell manufacturing capacity of roughly 35 GW and has held a BNEF Tier 1 designation since 2024. On institutional footprint, AIKO's global scale and multi-year Tier 1 standing give it the broader financing track record at this stage.

Mission Solar's lineup is geared toward the U.S. residential and light-commercial rooftop market, with modules built to withstand hurricane-force wind loads - a deliberate focus given the Gulf Coast geography of its Texas plant. Its panels have historically relied on PERC monocrystalline cell technology, delivering efficiencies in roughly the 18-22% range, and the brand's primary competitive advantage is domestic-content eligibility, which can unlock an additional 10% on top of the standard federal investment tax credit. AIKO, by contrast, is built around its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) architecture, a back-contact cell design that the company has used to set successive mass-production efficiency records - reaching 24.8% at the commercial module level in late 2025 and topping the TaiyangNews global module efficiency rankings for more than 34 consecutive months. Its panels are sold across residential, commercial, and utility-scale segments worldwide.

For a U.S. buyer who qualifies for domestic-content incentives or who needs panels built for extreme weather, Mission Solar is the more logical choice - the financial uplift from the tax credit bonus can meaningfully offset any per-watt cost premium. For buyers elsewhere, or U.S. buyers for whom the domestic-content adder does not apply, AIKO's ABC modules offer demonstrably higher efficiency and an established international bankability profile. The two brands are not interchangeable: they occupy different technology tiers and serve different market contexts.

\---LINKS---

\- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2025/03/21/mission-solar-announces-2-gw-solar-cell-manufacturing-in-texas/ \| Mission Solar announces 2 GW solar cell manufacturing in Texas \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/03/25/mission-solar-announces-2-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-texas/ \| Mission Solar announces 2 GW solar cell factory in Texas \| article

\- https://www.solar.com/learn/mission-solar-energy-complete-solar-panels-review/ \| Mission Solar Energy - complete solar panels review \| review

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar panels review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://aikosolar.com/en/new-world-record-mass-produced-module-efficiency/ \| AIKO new world record 24.4% mass-produced module efficiency \| article

Sources:

\- \[Mission Solar announces 2 GW solar cell manufacturing in Texas\](https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2025/03/21/mission-solar-announces-2-gw-solar-cell-manufacturing-in-texas/)

\- \[Mission Solar announces 2 GW solar cell factory in Texas\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/03/25/mission-solar-announces-2-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-texas/)

\- \[Mission Solar Energy - complete solar panels review\](https://www.solar.com/learn/mission-solar-energy-complete-solar-panels-review/)

\- \[Aiko Solar panels review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html)

\- \[AIKO new world record 24.4% mass-produced module efficiency\](https://aikosolar.com/en/new-world-record-mass-produced-module-efficiency/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Mission Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-mission-solar)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Mission Solar](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-mission-solar)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Mission Solar](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-mission-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-mission-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.