---
title: "AIKO vs Miolentek - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Miolentek solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-miolentek"
---

# AIKO vs Miolentek

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 0 models). AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Miolentek |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Shenzhen |
| Founded | 2009 | 2015 |
| Employees |  | 200 |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [http://www.miolentek.com](http://www.miolentek.com) |

Shenzhen Mioulong Technology Co., Ltd. (Miolentek) focuses on designing, researching, developing, manufacturing, and selling various solar panels including PET, ETFE, epoxy, and glass solar panels. They offer OEM/ODM services and release new products monthly to meet market trends. The company operates in-house...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Miolentek | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 0 | +144 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 0 W | +805 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 0 W | +581 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Miolentek | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Miolentek | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 0 (0%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Miolentek |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Miolentek |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | AIKO | Miolentek |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 0 |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Miolentek is a small Chinese manufacturer operating as Shenzhen Mioulong Technology Co., Ltd., based in Shenzhen and active in export markets since at least 2015. The company produces compact and flexible panel formats - PET, ETFE, epoxy-encapsulated, and semi-flexible laminates - primarily for portable chargers, IoT devices, and other low-wattage specialty applications. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 listing or significant independent installer review has surfaced for the brand, reflecting its position as a component supplier to niche end markets rather than a mainstream module manufacturer. AIKO, by contrast, is Guangdong Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd., founded in 2009 and headquartered in Guangdong, China, with a reported production capacity of around 20 GW per year as of early 2025. AIKO achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024, confirming its bankability with commercial project lenders, and has maintained a top position in the TaiyangNews global module efficiency rankings since 2023. AIKO carries a substantially larger institutional footprint than Miolentek.

AIKO's product line is built around its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) technology, which relocates all electrical contacts to the rear of the cell to maximize light absorption. Its Neostar series targets premium residential rooftops and commercial installations, with module efficiencies confirmed above 24% in mass production and a 30-year performance warranty rated at no more than 0.35% annual degradation after the first year. Miolentek's catalog covers an entirely different market tier - small rigid glass panels, flexible ETFE laminates, and epoxy-sealed mini panels designed for off-grid gadgets, RV and marine applications, and embedded power solutions rather than grid-tied residential or utility-scale projects.

For any buyer evaluating rooftop solar or commercial ground-mount installations, AIKO is the relevant choice, offering Tier 1 bankability, independently tested high efficiency, and a strong long-term warranty. Miolentek serves a distinct portable and embedded niche and is not a meaningful alternative to AIKO in the residential or commercial solar market. The two brands are essentially non-competing.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| AIKO Solar installer and consumer review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://sunsparkenergy.com.au/blog/solar-panels-1/aiko-solar-panels-review-2025-14 \| AIKO Solar Panels Review 2025 - Sun Spark Energy \| review

\- https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/ \| AIKO achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 status - official announcement \| article

\- https://www.vicoexport.com/en/64212/tier-1-solar-panel-manufacturers-list-q4-2025/ \| Tier 1 Solar Panel Manufacturers List Q4 2025 - Vico Export \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Miolentek](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-miolentek)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Miolentek](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-miolentek)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Miolentek](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-miolentek)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-miolentek

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

