---
title: "AIKO vs MicroQuanta - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs MicroQuanta solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-microquanta"
---

# AIKO vs MicroQuanta

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 0 models). AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | MicroQuanta |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Hangzhou |
| Founded | 2009 | 2015 |
| Employees |  | 39 |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [http://www.microquanta.com](http://www.microquanta.com) |

Microquanta Semiconductor is a developer and manufacturer of perovskite solar cell modules created to provide clean energy. The company's perovskite photovoltaic modules feature high energy conversion efficiency, offering business clients flexible clean energy solutions. Microquanta is a global pioneer in perovskite...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | MicroQuanta | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 0 | +144 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 0 W | +805 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 0 W | +581 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | MicroQuanta | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | MicroQuanta | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 0 (0%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | MicroQuanta |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | MicroQuanta |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | AIKO | MicroQuanta |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 0 |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO is a Chinese manufacturer, founded in 2009 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, that has built its business around N-type ABC (All Back Contact) cell technology and reached BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable status by 2024. The company operates module production capacity in the tens of gigawatts per year and has an established international sales network, including distributors in Australia and Europe. MicroQuanta Semiconductor is also a Chinese company, but it is a specialist perovskite and perovskite-silicon tandem developer rather than a mass-market crystalline silicon producer, and it is not listed among the recognized Bloomberg Tier 1 manufacturers, since that ranking is dominated by conventional silicon players. AIKO clearly has the stronger institutional footprint, with public listing, established bankability status, and large-scale commercial shipping history, while MicroQuanta remains an emerging-technology company still scaling gigawatt-level production.

In terms of product focus, AIKO sells across three main series - Neostar for residential rooftops, Comet for commercial and industrial roofs, and Stellar for utility-scale bifacial ground-mount projects - all built on its ABC cell architecture, with reported module efficiencies reaching into the mid-20s percent range on its newest Infinite Ultra generation. MicroQuanta, in contrast, is focused on building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV), supplying perovskite and colored perovskite-silicon tandem modules for architectural façades and translucent roofing, including what it describes as the world's largest perovskite-based BIPV installation. Its technology is still transitioning from pilot and demonstration projects toward gigawatt-scale mass production.

For a typical buyer in 2025 seeking a bankable, mainstream residential or utility-scale panel, AIKO is the more conventional and lower-risk choice given its Tier 1 status, product breadth, and manufacturing scale. MicroQuanta is not really a substitute in that market; it serves a niche of architects and developers wanting aesthetic, building-integrated perovskite solutions, and buyers should treat its offerings as an emerging technology rather than a direct competitor to AIKO's established silicon modules.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar panels independent review \| review

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-solar-launches-abc-series-of-modules-for-utility-scale-operations/ \| Aiko Solar launches ABC series of modules for utility-scale operations \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/17/microquanta-developing-perovskite-solar-modules-for-bipv-applications/ \| Microquanta developing perovskite solar modules for BIPV applications \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/06/24/microquanta-launches-26-efficient-colored-perovskite-silicon-tandem-modules-for-building-integrated-pv/ \| Microquanta launches 26%-efficient colored perovskite-silicon tandem modules \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/microquanta \| MicroQuanta Semiconductor Co., Ltd. company profile \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs MicroQuanta](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-microquanta)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs MicroQuanta](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-microquanta)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs MicroQuanta](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-microquanta)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-microquanta

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.