---
title: "AIKO vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai"
---

# AIKO vs Hyundai

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 65 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Seongnam-si |
| Founded | 2009 | 2004 |
| Employees |  | 206 |
| Annual capacity |  | 1.35 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 65 | +79 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 640 W | +165 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 442 W | +139 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 23.40% | +1.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 21.49% | +2.16 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.030 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 43 (66%) | +42 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 27.4 yrs | +2.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 7 (10.8%) |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 17 (26.2%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 12 (18.5%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 4 (6.2%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 8 (12.3%) |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 49 (75.4%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 5 (7.7%) |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 3 (4.6%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)


| Technology | AIKO | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 9 (13.8%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 6 (9.2%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AIKO, founded in 2009 and headquartered in Shenzhen, China, is a focused solar manufacturer listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange that achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable status by Q3 2024. Hyundai Energy Solutions, operating since 2004 under the Fortune Global 500 HD Hyundai Group, is listed on the Korea Stock Exchange and runs a 1.35 GW annual manufacturing capacity in South Korea. Both hold Tier 1 status, but Hyundai carries deeper institutional credibility through its longer operating history, larger production footprint, and the financial backing of one of the world's largest industrial conglomerates - factors that matter in lender due diligence and large-contract procurement.

The portfolio differences are substantial. AIKO's 144-model catalog is built around its proprietary All Back Contact cell architecture, which accounts for 73.6% of its lineup and pushes average module efficiency to 23.7% with an average rated output of 581 Wp; its top product reaches 805 Wp at 25.2% efficiency. Its temperature coefficient averages -0.27% per degree Celsius and warranties average 29.5 years, both favorable figures for hot-climate rooftop applications. Only 24.3% of AIKO's panels are bifacial, signaling a lineup aimed squarely at premium residential and commercial rooftop buyers where space is limited and per-panel yield counts most. Hyundai's 65-model range averages 21.5% efficiency and 442 Wp, topping out at 640 Wp and 23.4%, with a slightly weaker temperature coefficient of -0.30% per degree Celsius and 27.4-year average warranties. However, 66.2% of Hyundai's catalog is bifacial, and its leading cell technology is HJT, represented across 38.5% of models - a combination that fits utility-scale and ground-mount projects well, where bifacial albedo gain can close the efficiency gap.

For most buyers in 2025, the choice maps to application. AIKO is the stronger pick for space-constrained rooftop projects where maximum watts per square meter is decisive; its Back Contact technology and warranty depth are genuine differentiators. Hyundai suits large ground-mount or commercial installations where bifacial output, an established supply chain, and the assurance of a multi-decade corporate parent take priority. On raw quality and bankability, neither is the wrong answer.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/03/12/hyundai-builds-1-37-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-south-korea/ \| Hyundai builds 1.37 GW solar cell factory in South Korea - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://taiyangnews.info/technology/aiko-solar-abc-module-power-efficiency \| AIKO ABC Module - Making the Most of Each Electron - TaiyangNews \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/ \| HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells \| article

Sources:

\- \[Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[Hyundai builds 1.37 GW solar cell factory in South Korea\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/03/12/hyundai-builds-1-37-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-south-korea/)

\- \[AIKO ABC Module - Making the Most of Each Electron\](https://taiyangnews.info/technology/aiko-solar-abc-module-power-efficiency)

\- \[Aiko Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html)

\- \[HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells\](https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-hyundai)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-hyundai)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.