--- title: "AIKO vs HT-SAAE - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AIKO vs HT-SAAE solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ht-saae" --- # AIKO vs HT-SAAE AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 112 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. HT-SAAE leans bifacial (47% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AIKO | HT-SAAE | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Shanghai | Shanghai | | Founded | 2009 | 1998 | | Employees | | 500+ | | Annual capacity | | 2+ GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | SZSE: 600732 | Shanghai Stock Exchange: 600151:SHH | | Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [http://www.ht-saae.com](http://www.ht-saae.com) | HT-SAAE (Shanghai Aerospace Automobile Electromechanical Co., Ltd.) is a state-owned enterprise specializing in photovoltaic products. The company integrates polysilicon, solar cells, battery packs, and photovoltaic + energy storage systems. They develop and manufacture solar panels for residential, commercial, and... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AIKO | HT-SAAE | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 144 | 112 | +32 | | Max Power | 805 W | 715 W | +90 W | | Avg Power | 581 W | 470 W | +112 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AIKO | HT-SAAE | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 23.90% | +1.30 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 20.47% | +3.18 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AIKO | HT-SAAE | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.322%/°C | +0.051 | | Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 53 (47%) | +23 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.4 yr | ## Efficiency distribution AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AIKO | HT-SAAE | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 30 (26.8%) | | 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 4 (3.6%) | | 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 12 (10.7%) | | 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 39 (34.8%) | | 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 27 (24.1%) | ## Power distribution AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup) | Power band | AIKO | HT-SAAE | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 30 (26.8%) | | 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 33 (29.5%) | | 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 29 (25.9%) | | 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 16 (14.3%) | | 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 4 (3.6%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (79%) | Technology | AIKO | HT-SAAE | | --- | --- | --- | | Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 | | N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 | | PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 19 (17.0%) | | Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 0 | 88 (78.6%) | | Unknown | 0 | 5 (4.5%) | ## Top panels, AIKO | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, HT-SAAE | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HT66-210(ND)-F 695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-210-nd-f-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HT66-18X(N)-630W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-630w) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HT66-18X(N)-625W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-625w) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F 620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HT66-18X(N)-620W](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-n-620w) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HT66-18X(ND)-F-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/ht-saae-ht66-18x-nd-f-620) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer that, despite being a relatively young commercial PV entrant, achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status in Q3 2024. By early 2025, its reported annual production capacity stood at approximately 20 GW and has continued to expand. HT-SAAE operates from a very different starting point: it is a subsidiary of China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC), a state-owned Fortune 500 enterprise, with roots in space-grade solar cell development dating to 1960 and a pivot to commercial terrestrial PV applications beginning in 2000. HT-SAAE has maintained consistent BloombergNEF Tier 1 standing for many years and runs multiple manufacturing facilities across China alongside a 2 GW plant in Turkey. On institutional longevity and lender familiarity, HT-SAAE holds the stronger footprint in project-finance circles. AIKO has staked its identity on its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) cell architecture, which relocates all metal contacts to the rear of the cell to maximize light-capture area. The company reported a 24.4% module efficiency world record for mass-produced commercially available panels in June 2025, and its products are positioned primarily as a premium choice for space-constrained residential and commercial rooftops where yield per square meter justifies a higher upfront cost. HT-SAAE offers a broader lineup spanning both N-type TOPCon and P-type PERC modules, with documented efficiencies ranging from around 20% to roughly 24% across its product range. Pricing is generally mid-range, making HT-SAAE panels a practical fit across residential, commercial, and utility-scale ground-mount applications. The company also holds a spot on the PVEL PV Top Performers list across multiple test categories. For a typical buyer in 2025, the choice maps to priorities. AIKO is the more compelling option when rooftop real estate is at a premium and a buyer wants leading-edge ABC efficiency backed by strong installer recognition. HT-SAAE suits cost-sensitive commercial or utility procurement where a long Tier 1 history, diversified product range, and competitive watt-pricing carry more weight than chasing efficiency records. The two brands serve overlapping but distinct segments and are not straightforwardly interchangeable. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| AIKO Solar panels independent review - SolarQuotes \| review \- https://mcelectrical.com.au/debunking-the-aiko-solar-panel-hype-a-real-world-performance-test/ \| AIKO Solar real-world performance test - MC Electrical \| review \- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/ht-saae-review.html \| HT-SAAE Solar panels independent review - SolarQuotes \| review \- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/ht-saae/ \| HT-SAAE solar panels overview - EnergySage \| review \- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/ht-saae-solar-panels-review/ \| HT-SAAE Solar Panels independent review - Solar Choice \| review Sources: \- \[AIKO Solar panels review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html) \- \[AIKO real-world performance test - MC Electrical\](https://mcelectrical.com.au/debunking-the-aiko-solar-panel-hype-a-real-world-performance-test/) \- \[HT-SAAE panels review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/ht-saae-review.html) \- \[HT-SAAE overview - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/ht-saae/) \- \[HT-SAAE independent review - Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/ht-saae-solar-panels-review/) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs HT-SAAE](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ht-saae) - [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet) - [AKCOME vs HT-SAAE](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-ht-saae) - [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs HT-SAAE](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-ht-saae) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ht-saae Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.