---
title: "AIKO vs Heliene - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Heliene solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-heliene"
---

# AIKO vs Heliene

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 91 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Heliene leans bifacial (65% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Heliene |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Canada |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Sault Ste. Marie |
| Founded | 2009 | 2010 |
| Employees |  | 200-600 |
| Annual capacity |  | 1.3 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [https://heliene.com](https://heliene.com) |

Heliene is a North American headquartered manufacturer of high-quality, competitively priced solar photovoltaic modules. They have manufacturing operations in the US and Canada, and a global supply chain capability. Heliene is committed to providing reliable and high-performing solar solutions for utility-scale...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Heliene | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 91 | +53 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 710 W | +95 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 528 W | +54 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Heliene | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 23.08% | +2.12 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 21.47% | +2.19 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Heliene | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.315%/°C | +0.045 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 59 (65%) | +41 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +4.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Heliene |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 4 (4.4%) |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 29 (31.9%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 21 (23.1%) |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 35 (38.5%) |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Heliene |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 10 (11.0%) |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 22 (24.2%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 40 (44.0%) |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 16 (17.6%) |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 3 (3.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | AIKO | Heliene |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 27 (29.7%) |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 39 (42.9%) |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 20 (22.0%) |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (5.5%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Heliene


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [132HC-710 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-710-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [132HC-705 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-705-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [132HC-700 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-700-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [132HC-695 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-695-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [132HC-690 G12 HJT Bifacial Module](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-132hc-690-g12-hjt-bifacial-module) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [156HC-645 M10 NTYP SL](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-645-m10-ntyp-sl) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [156HC-640 M10 NTYP SL](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-640-m10-ntyp-sl) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [156HC-635 M10 NTYP SL BIFACIAL MODULE](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-635-m10-ntyp-sl-bifacial-module) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [156HC-635 M10 NTYP SL](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-635-m10-ntyp-sl) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [156HC-630 M10 NTYP SL BIFACIAL MODULE](https://comparepv.com/panel/heliene-156hc-630-m10-ntyp-sl-bifacial-module) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Heliene is a Canadian solar module manufacturer, founded in 2009 and headquartered in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, with additional manufacturing plants in Minnesota and Florida. It is broadly recognized as a Tier 1 bankable manufacturer and has been rapidly expanding US-based capacity, reaching roughly 1.3 GW domestically after opening a new 500 MW line in Rogers, Minnesota in 2025. AIKO, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer that earned Bloomberg Tier 1 status in 2024 and operates at a far larger industrial scale, with reported annual capacity around 35 GW for TOPCon cells and ambitions toward 100 GW for its proprietary ABC cell line, including a 30 GW Jinan plant ramping through 2025. On sheer manufacturing scale and global market presence, AIKO has the stronger institutional footprint, while Heliene's advantage lies in its North American manufacturing base and domestic-content positioning.

Heliene's product range spans compact panels around 380W for cabins and off-grid use up to high-power 700W-plus modules, covering residential, commercial and utility-scale ground-mount projects, with both monofacial and bifacial options built mainly on conventional PERC/TOPCon-style cell platforms. AIKO's lineup centers on its distinctive ABC (All Back Contact) cell technology, a rear-contact design that has pushed mass-production efficiencies to around 24.6 percent, making its panels a common choice for premium residential rooftops and high-density commercial installations where aesthetics and per-panel wattage matter, alongside a parallel TOPCon product line for more mainstream volume segments.

For a typical 2025 buyer, the choice often comes down to priorities rather than one brand being objectively superior. Buyers who value North American manufacturing, domestic content requirements, or shorter supply chains for US utility and commercial projects will likely favor Heliene, while those prioritizing peak efficiency, sleek all-black aesthetics, and cutting-edge cell technology for premium rooftops may lean toward AIKO. Both carry credible Tier 1 bankability, so the decision is largely about project context rather than one brand being categorically better.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/06/04/heliene-expands-solar-module-capacity-with-new-500-mw-minnesota-plant/ \| Heliene expands solar module capacity with new Minnesota plant \| article

\- https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2025/06/heliene-opens-500-mw-solar-panel-assembly-facility-in-minneapolis-area/ \| Heliene opens 500-MW solar panel assembly facility in Minneapolis \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/aiko-capacity-upgrades-abc-cell-technology/ \| Aiko steps up ABC transition with 11GW capacity upgrade \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/01/10/chinese-pv-industry-brief-aiko-solar-starts-making-back-contact-pv-panels/ \| Chinese PV Industry Brief: Aiko Solar starts making ABC panels \| article

\- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/21665/heliene/ \| Heliene - Profile & Reviews 2026 \| review

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Heliene](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-heliene)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Heliene](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-heliene)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Heliene](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-heliene)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-heliene

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.