---
title: "AIKO vs Easun Power - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AIKO vs Easun Power solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-easun-power"
---

# AIKO vs Easun Power

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 2 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AIKO | Easun Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Shenzhen |
| Founded | 2009 | 2006 |
| Employees |  | 51-100 |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | SZSE: 600732 |  |
| Website | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) | [https://www.easunpower.com](https://www.easunpower.com) |

EASUN Power, founded in 2006, specializes in solar inverters and battery storage solutions. With nearly two decades of expertise, they are dedicated to delivering efficient and reliable energy solutions for residential, commercial, and off-grid applications. The company aims to provide affordable and innovative solar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AIKO | Easun Power | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 144 | 2 | +142 |
| Max Power | 805 W | 200 W | +605 W |
| Avg Power | 581 W | 150 W | +431 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AIKO | Easun Power | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 25.20% | 20.50% | +4.70 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.65% | 20.07% | +3.59 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AIKO | Easun Power | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.271%/°C | -0.400%/°C | +0.129 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (24%) | 0 (0%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.5 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AIKO | Easun Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 3 (2.1%) | 1 (50.0%) |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.1%) | 1 (50.0%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (2.1%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 12 (8.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 123 (85.4%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | AIKO | Easun Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.4%) | 2 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 50 (34.7%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 5 (3.5%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 78 (54.2%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 9 (6.2%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | AIKO | Easun Power |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Back Contact | 119 (82.6%) | 0 |
| N-type | 17 (11.8%) | 0 |
| PERC | 7 (4.9%) | 0 |
| Flexible | 1 (0.7%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 2 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Easun Power


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [YH200W-12M](https://comparepv.com/panel/easun-power-yh200w-12m) | 200 | 20.5 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [YH100W-12M](https://comparepv.com/panel/easun-power-yh100w-12m) | 100 | 19.6 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Easun Power is a Chinese electronics and energy company founded around 2008 and headquartered in China, with its primary identity built around solar inverters, hybrid charge controllers, and LiFePO4 battery storage rather than solar modules. The company claims cumulative installations exceeding 10 GW across more than 100 countries, though that figure reflects inverter deployments. Easun Power does sell solar panels under its brand, but they represent a secondary product line, and the company does not appear on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 Solar Module Maker list. AIKO - formally Shanghai Aiko Solar Energy Co., Ltd. - was founded in 1996 and is headquartered in Shanghai, with manufacturing spread across production bases in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Shandong. AIKO achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status in Q3 2024 and reported approximately 20 GW of annual module production capacity as of early 2025. On institutional standing as a solar panel manufacturer, AIKO holds a clear advantage.

The product profiles of the two companies point in quite different directions. Easun Power's solar panels are sold primarily as accessories to its inverter and storage ecosystem, making them most relevant for budget-conscious off-grid or hybrid residential setups where buyers are already using Easun inverters. Customer reliability feedback from forums and review platforms has been mixed, with some reports of quality control issues. AIKO, by contrast, has built its entire business around one ambitious technology: N-type All Back Contact cells, which relocate all electrical contacts to the rear of the cell. This approach has delivered mass-production module efficiencies above 24%, and AIKO took first place in the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers' Choice Awards. The Neostar product family targets premium residential and compact commercial rooftops where space efficiency and long-term yield justify a higher upfront price. AIKO also offers a 30-year performance warranty with an annual degradation rate of 0.35% after year one.

For a buyer evaluating solar panels specifically, AIKO is the stronger default choice in 2025: it is a dedicated module manufacturer with verified Tier 1 bankability, proven high-efficiency technology, and growing installer endorsement. Easun Power is a reasonable option only if a buyer is already invested in the Easun inverter ecosystem and prioritizes a lower entry price over module performance or long-term institutional support.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| AIKO Solar panels review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

\- https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/ \| AIKO achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 status \| article

\- https://www.vicoexport.com/en/62487/tier-1-list-of-solar-panel-manufacturers-q3-2025/ \| Tier 1 list of solar panel manufacturers Q3 2025 - Vico Export \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/easun-power \| Easun Power Technology Co. Ltd - ENF Solar company profile \| article

\- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdkVNV5djeA \| NEW AIKO Neostar 3 Review - Are Aiko Solar Panels the BEST in 2025? \| video

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AIKO vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Easun Power](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-easun-power)
- [AIKO vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs Easun Power](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-easun-power)
- [AIKO vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs Easun Power](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-easun-power)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-easun-power

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.